Website review, no card needed

cuff.com.br logo

cuff.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202640 issues · 107 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on cuff.com.br, 19 of them high impact, across 107 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 16.9 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.2 sMay 16Oct 312.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Oct 31, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
638 ms282 msMay 16Oct 31526 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026323 ms
May 23, 2026377 ms
May 30, 2026432 ms
Jun 6, 2026511 ms
Jun 13, 2026543 ms
Jun 20, 2026569 ms
Jun 27, 2026582 ms
Jul 4, 2026597 ms
Jul 11, 2026593 ms
Jul 18, 2026589 ms
Jul 25, 2026574 ms
Aug 1, 2026545 ms
Aug 8, 2026535 ms
Aug 15, 2026507 ms
Aug 22, 2026527 ms
Aug 29, 2026536 ms
Sep 5, 2026560 ms
Sep 12, 2026569 ms
Sep 19, 2026577 ms
Sep 26, 2026584 ms
Oct 3, 2026571 ms
Oct 10, 2026569 ms
Oct 17, 2026553 ms
Oct 24, 2026541 ms
Oct 31, 2026526 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of cuff.com.br (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. cuff.com.br at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. cuff.com.br at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. cuff.com.br at 3.1 s3.1 s
  4. cuff.com.br at 4.1 s4.1 s
  5. cuff.com.br at 5.1 s5.1 s
  6. cuff.com.br at 6.2 s6.2 s
  7. cuff.com.br at 7.2 s7.2 s
  8. cuff.com.br at 8.2 s8.2 s

cuff.com.br does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

10 to fix38
  • Main-thread work: 16.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 16.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and Clarity and others), adding 1.4 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 770 KiB

    About 770 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 721 ms

    721 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 721 ms of main-thread work and 530 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 304 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,927 HTML elements

    The page has 2,927 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    264 KiB

    24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (264 KiB).

  • Shopify adds 206 ms

    206 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 206 ms of main-thread work and 526 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Improve image delivery

    174 KiB

    5 images could be 174 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 19 KiB

    About 19 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 18 ms

    18 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.9 s

    23.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    Your largest element takes 6.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 7.6 s

    7.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 748 ms

    748 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 748 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.271

    0.271

    The layout shifts by 0.271 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 52% slower for real visitors

    +52%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 323 ms to 526 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 835 ms

    835 ms

    Real visitors wait 835 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 196 ms

    196 ms

    Real visitors wait 196 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 4.8 MB in 441 requests

    4.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.8 MB in 441 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (88), other files 1.5 MB (280) and images 1,007 KiB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Banner_Brinde_Cool_Kids_185x.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.35 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.35 g of CO₂e: 162.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8290
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 9 text elements with low contrast

    9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 7 images without alt text

    7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (28 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 28 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 13 links without text

    13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 92100
  • 200 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 200 pages on cuff.com.br and 15 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Loja online de acessórios femininos para o dia a dia. Peças com banho de ouro e ródio branco, verniz antialérgico, comb…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “CUFF Jewelry | Acessórios femininos atemporais”.

  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “CUFF Jewelry | Acessórios femininos atemporais”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://cuff.com.br/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://cuff.com.br/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,098 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 4 pages without a meta description

    /collections/todos-os-produtos, /collections/brincos-dourados, /collections/brincos-prata and /collections/segundo-furo have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /collections/best-sellers and /collections/presenteaveis have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    /collections/best-sellers and /collections/presenteaveis have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 73 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://cuff.com.br/.

  • 27 small tap targets

    27 of 78 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “❌ GTM não foi carregado - verifique o Container ID”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 91 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://shopify.com/75361517826/account/orders?locale=pt-PT&region_country=BR&consent=s0.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (cuff.com.br).

  • Valid certificate (78 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for cuff.com.br and is valid for another 78 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://cuff.com.br redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 49 links work

    All 49 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 9 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    cuff.com.br has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 7 years old

    7 years

    cuff.com.br was registered in Feb 2019. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • DNSSEC is on

    cuff.com.br's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

  • Registered until Feb 2028

    cuff.com.br is registered until Feb 2028.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 415 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 415 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 7 short forms

    7 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Email authentication

2 to fix10
  • No DMARC policy

    cuff.com.br has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No SPF record

    cuff.com.br has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

  • Email authentication score: 10/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 32 cookies set on arrival

    32

    Opening the homepage sets 32 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 48 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 48 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

None of the apps your storefront loads is on the list of apps with a known security problem.

Apps your storefront loads

Wascer Tracking · Rez Bundle Upsell · Judge Me Reviews · Vex Auto Add To Cart · Rez Preorder Back In Stock · Microsoft Clarity · Zepto Product Personalizer · Forms · martz.com.br · martzapis.com.br · nice-team.net

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on cuff.com.br, including 19 speed issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25