Website review, no card needed

dailymotion.com logo

dailymotion.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202646 issues · 89 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on dailymotion.com, 17 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.7 s3.6 sApr 18Oct 35.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20263.9 s
Apr 25, 20264.1 s
May 2, 20264.4 s
May 9, 20264.7 s
May 16, 20264.7 s
May 23, 20264.6 s
May 30, 20264.6 s
Jun 6, 20264.6 s
Jun 13, 20264.5 s
Jun 20, 20264.4 s
Jun 27, 20264.5 s
Jul 4, 20264.6 s
Jul 11, 20264.8 s
Jul 18, 20265.1 s
Jul 25, 20265.2 s
Aug 1, 20265.3 s
Aug 8, 20265.3 s
Aug 15, 20265.2 s
Aug 22, 20265.3 s
Aug 29, 20265.3 s
Sep 5, 20265.4 s
Sep 12, 20265.4 s
Sep 19, 20265.5 s
Sep 26, 20265.5 s
Oct 3, 20265.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
321 ms267 msApr 18Oct 3285 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026312 ms
Apr 25, 2026315 ms
May 2, 2026313 ms
May 9, 2026306 ms
May 16, 2026296 ms
May 23, 2026288 ms
May 30, 2026281 ms
Jun 6, 2026278 ms
Jun 13, 2026281 ms
Jun 20, 2026287 ms
Jun 27, 2026289 ms
Jul 4, 2026292 ms
Jul 11, 2026291 ms
Jul 18, 2026289 ms
Jul 25, 2026290 ms
Aug 1, 2026288 ms
Aug 8, 2026285 ms
Aug 15, 2026280 ms
Aug 22, 2026275 ms
Aug 29, 2026273 ms
Sep 5, 2026274 ms
Sep 12, 2026277 ms
Sep 19, 2026279 ms
Sep 26, 2026282 ms
Oct 3, 2026285 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of dailymotion.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. dailymotion.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. dailymotion.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. dailymotion.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. dailymotion.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. dailymotion.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. dailymotion.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. dailymotion.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. dailymotion.com at 3.2 s3.2 s

dailymotion.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

8 to fix51
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    6.9 s · 1.0 MB

    39 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.0 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.2 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    5.4 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51 (desktop: 67). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    320 ms · 63 KiB

    About 63 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 320 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 42 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,802 HTML elements

    The page has 1,802 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Hubvisor, LiveRamp Privacy Manager and privacy-mgmt.com and others), adding 518 KiB and 232 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    200 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 162 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    77 KiB

    8 images could be 77 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify JavaScript

    28 KiB

    28 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    22 KiB

    22 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    Real visitors wait 6.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 5.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.8 s

    8.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 18.2 s

    18.2 s

    Your largest element takes 18.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.5 s

    20.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.0 s

    9.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 306 ms

    306 ms

    Real visitors wait 306 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.22

    0.22

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.22 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 36% slower for real visitors

    +36%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 5.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 880 ms

    880 ms

    Real visitors wait 880 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 216 ms

    216 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 216 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

2 checks passed
  • Tap response (INP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 312 ms to 285 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.082

    0.082

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.082, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix67
  • Page weight: 2.9 MB in 121 requests

    2.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 121 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (35), fonts 367 KiB (8) and other files 243 KiB (46). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.84 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.84 g of CO₂e: 100.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 9590
  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings should not be empty (2 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 9259
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (11 characters)

    Your title is only 11 characters: “Dailymotion”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Invalid hreflang

    Your hreflang tags are invalid, so Google may show the wrong language version.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

2 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.dailymotion.com/map-videos-latest.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to manifest at 'https://static.neon-ssr.dailymotion.com/neon-user-ssr/static/favicons/manifest.d2ccee56e762a6c4b…”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (dailymotion.com).

  • Valid certificate (164 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon ECDSA 256 M04 verifies for dailymotion.com and is valid for another 164 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://dailymotion.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • security.txt published

    A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    dailymotion.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    dailymotion.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 21 years old

    21 years

    dailymotion.com was registered in Mar 2005 through Nameshield SAS. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Mar 2027

    dailymotion.com is registered until Mar 2027.

Content and conversion

6 to fix25
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 50 words

    The homepage has only about 50 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

Email authentication

95
  • Email authentication score: 95/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:_spf.google.com include:spfa.dailymotion.…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector2” and “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 46 issues on dailymotion.com, including 20 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25