Website review, no card needed
dlink.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202647 issues · 87 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on dlink.com.br, 19 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
69DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 122 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 120 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 151 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.5 s
2.2 s
3.0 s
3.7 s
4.5 s
5.2 s
6.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.6 s · 632 KiBAbout 632 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.6 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.7 s · 1.4 MB78 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.4 MB).
Render-blocking requests
2.0 s15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.
Font display
1.1 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).
Mobile performance score: 40
40/100Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.1 s
A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.
Google CDN adds 683 ms
683 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 683 ms of main-thread work and 741 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
470 ms · 67 KiBAbout 67 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 470 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 398 ms
398 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 398 ms of main-thread work and 345 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 291 ms
291 msFacebook costs a phone 291 ms of main-thread work and 226 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
19 long tasks on the main thread
19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 292 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
184 KiB2 images could be 184 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
24 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 8.4 s
8.4 sReal visitors wait 8.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.5 s
4.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.3 s
17.3 sYour largest element takes 17.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 18.8 s
18.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.0 s
10.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s
1.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 21% slower for real visitors
+21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 127 ms to 151 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.6 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 128 ms
128 msReal visitors wait 128 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.2 MB in 107 requests
3.2 MBYour homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 107 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (28), images 559 KiB (46) and fonts 494 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
156 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Banner-Wifi-6-D-Link.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 128 px. Resized copies would save about 156 KiB.
5 images in older formats
5 images (444 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (101 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.91 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.91 g of CO₂e: 108.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
17 images without alt text
17 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (70 characters)
Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “D-Link | Soluções inteligentes para provedores, empresas e residências”.
Meta description is short (38 characters)
Your meta description is only 38 characters: “Soluções Smart Home, SMB e Corporativa”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
39 internal links, 13 external
The homepage links to 39 pages on dlink.com.br and 13 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “D-Link”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.dlink.com.br/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.dlink.com.br/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.dlink.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Other pages
15 pages share a meta description
https://www.dlink.com.br/suporte, https://www.dlink.com.br/categoria/residencial/roteadores, https://www.dlink.com.br/categoria/residencial/cameras, https://www.dlink.com.br/categoria/residencial/wi-fi-na-casa-toda, https://www.dlink.com.br/my-dlink and https://www.dlink.com.br/smart-home and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
3 pages with very little text
https://www.dlink.com.br/categoria/residencial/cameras, https://www.dlink.com.br/onde-comprar and https://www.dlink.com.br/categoria/empresarial/wireless have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
15 small tap targets
15 of 29 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'replace')”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 90 words
The homepage has only about 90 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
16 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at dlink.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2021.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on dlink.com.br, including 23 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.