Website review, no card needed
efe.com.pe website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202648 issues · 105 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on efe.com.pe, 26 of them high impact, across 105 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65D- #78,108 of 84,341 reviewed websitesbeats 6%
- #41,038 of 42,599 online storesbeats 3%
- #478 of 604 Magento storesbeats 18%
Closest competitors among Magento stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 290 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 284 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 277 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 292 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 285 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 285 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 309 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 310 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 314 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 318 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 322 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 326 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 329 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.6 s
5.3 s
7.9 s
10.5 s
13.1 s
15.8 s
18.4 s
21.0 s
efe.com.pe does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.1 s · 720 KiB19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (720 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
2.8 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.
Main-thread work: 23.9 s
A phone's processor spends 23.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 16.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 883 KiBAbout 883 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.4 s
1.4 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 715 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
14,755 HTML elements
The page has 14,755 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused CSS
1.1 s · 137 KiBAbout 137 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 26
26/100Your mobile performance score is 26. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
5.6 MB62 images could be 5.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and TikTok and others), adding 1.9 MB and 3.7 s of main-thread time.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.0 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Hubspot adds 852 ms
852 msHubspot costs a phone 852 ms of main-thread work and 312 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
TikTok adds 545 ms
545 msTikTok costs a phone 545 ms of main-thread work and 292 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 486 ms
486 msFacebook costs a phone 486 ms of main-thread work and 299 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
32 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 33 ms
33 msYour server sent the HTML in 33 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.7 s
5.7 sReal visitors wait 5.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.9 s
4.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors wait 4.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 13.3 s
13.3 sYour largest element takes 13.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “slide”.
Speed Index: 17.2 s
17.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 5.1 s
5.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 5.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 93.2 s
93.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 93.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.2 s
5.2 sThe first text or image appears after 5.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 495 ms
495 msReal visitors wait 495 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 26% slower for real visitors
+26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 images without width and height
7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 290 ms to 329 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.05
0.05For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 25.6 MB in 495 requests
25.6 MBYour homepage downloads 25.6 MB in 495 requests on a phone: images 22.4 MB (150), scripts 2.4 MB (223) and HTML 396 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
12 images over 500 KB
12 images weigh 11.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
efe-slider-b2c-02-computo-02_51.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image far larger than shown
81 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example DORMITORIOS_1.png at 321 px wide, shown at 62 px. Resized copies would save about 81 KiB.
About 7.2 g of CO₂ per visit
7.25 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.25 g of CO₂e: 869.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
73 links without text
73 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 287 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Tiendas EFE: Tecnología y Electrodomésticos Online” and “Multiservicios”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
1,227 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 1,227 pages on efe.com.pe and 5 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 158 characters
Your meta description is 158 characters: “Ofertas de Cyber Wow. Encuentra tecnología de LG, Samsung, Lenovo, Asus y HP, y línea blanca de Miray, Indurama, Panaso…”.
Title: 54 characters
Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Cyber Wow 2026 | Del 2 al 5 de Noviembre | Tiendas EFE”.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.efe.com.pe/media/sitemap/sitemap_efe.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (5,144 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (9 KiB, 63 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to /wishlist, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
4 pages share a meta description
/catalog/product_compare, /evalua-credito-efectiva, /localizador-tiendas and /blog use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page without an H1
/evalua-credito-efectiva has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
/estilo-de-vida/trabajo-y-estudio-en-casa/tablets.html took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 192 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the script 'https://script.google.com/macros/s/AKfycbz2GLAo_L5PrXVZcMxCP6sToBVisxB8vcYdmynxoFs6_m-Igr6j-1BD7QT7…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
90 of 108 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken link to your own pages
1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.efe.com.pe/customer/account/ (network).
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (efe.com.pe).
Valid certificate (43 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for efe.com.pe and is valid for another 43 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://efe.com.pe redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
efe.com.pe has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,417 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,417 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
2 checks passed
99 short forms
99 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:200.37.185.40 ip4:200.37.185.42 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:em5540.efe.com.pe include:em9831.…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Didomi) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
29 cookies set on arrival
29Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
46 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 46 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Didomi
A consent management tool (Didomi) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2023.
Stack
- CMS
- HubSpot CMS
- E-commerce
- Magento
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Fastly
Company
- Founded
- 1961
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on efe.com.pe, including 26 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.