Website review, no card needed

electronicscience.com logo

electronicscience.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202631 issues · 95 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on electronicscience.com, 13 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of electronicscience.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. electronicscience.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. electronicscience.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. electronicscience.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  4. electronicscience.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  5. electronicscience.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  6. electronicscience.com at 5.1 s5.1 s
  7. electronicscience.com at 6.0 s6.0 s
  8. electronicscience.com at 6.9 s6.9 s

electronicscience.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix58
  • Improve image delivery

    1.9 s · 21.5 MB

    17 images could be 21.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.6 s · 15.2 MB

    34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (15.2 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.0 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (JSDelivr CDN, Google Fonts and Amazon Web Services and others), adding 11.0 MB and 3 ms of main-thread time.

  • cloudfront.net adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    cloudfront.net costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 10.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 69). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 112 KiB

    About 112 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    300 ms · 71 KiB

    71 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Amazon Web Services adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Amazon Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 438 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 27 KiB

    27 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 72 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    26 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 385 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 24 ms

    24 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 24 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix65
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 36.3 s

    36.3 s

    Your largest element takes 36.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hero Slide 1”.

  • Time to Interactive: 39.0 s

    39.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 39.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.3 s

    5.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

2 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.078

    0.078

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.078, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 22 ms

    22 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 22 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 22.5 MB in 107 requests

    22.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 22.5 MB in 107 requests on a phone: images 21.7 MB (18), other files 444 KiB (8) and stylesheets 195 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    whatwedo-img.jpeg weighs 2.3 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    2.5 MB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example whatwedo-img.jpeg at 3,008 px wide, shown at 336 px. Resized copies would save about 2.5 MB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (2.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 6.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.38 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.38 g of CO₂e: 765.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9398
  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 29 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10091
  • Meta description is long (179 characters)

    Your meta description is 179 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, LocalBusiness and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 9 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 9 pages on electronicscience.com and 0 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “ARCHITECTS OF INNOVATION”.

  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “eScience Corporation - Mobile CRM, Inventory & POS Solutions”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://electronicscience.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://electronicscience.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Parts of the site are closed to 3 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

3 checks passed
  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (480 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (2 KiB, 9 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without an H1

    /nav-pages/npc-seal.html has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 6 pages with very little text

    /nav-pages/solutions.html, /nav-pages/blog.html, /nav-pages/contact-us.html, /nav-pages/terms.html, /nav-pages/privacy.html and /nav-pages/npc-seal.html have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 8 internal pages checked

    We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 8 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9265
  • 6 broken images

    6 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://electronicscience.com/.

  • Scrolls sideways on phones

    On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the font 'https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/opensans/v44/memvYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVTSKmu0SC55K5gw.woff2' vi…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (electronicscience.com).

  • Valid certificate (95 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M04 verifies for electronicscience.com and is valid for another 95 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://electronicscience.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 9 links work

    All 9 links checked from your homepage (9 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    electronicscience.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    electronicscience.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 26 years old

    26 years

    electronicscience.com was registered in Mar 2000 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Mar 2028

    electronicscience.com is registered until Mar 2028.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 448 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 448 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Book a Demo” and “Start Your Transformation”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 32 testimonial or review blocks, 4 customer or partner logos, 2 trust badges and “100+ companies”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Email authentication

2 to fix40
  • No DMARC policy

    electronicscience.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 40/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:103.17.20.156/32 include:smtp.electronicscience.com include:email.freshdesk.com -all”.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on electronicscience.com, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25