Website review, no card needed
enabling.ch website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202635 issues · 99 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on enabling.ch, 16 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 104 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.3 s
2.6 s
4.0 s
5.3 s
6.6 s
7.9 s
9.2 s
10.5 s
enabling.ch does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.8 s · 1.4 MB101 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.4 MB).
Render-blocking requests
4.6 s56 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.6 s.
Font display
2.9 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.9 s).
Mobile performance score: 34
34/100Your mobile performance score is 34 (desktop: 60). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
900 ms · 192 KiBAbout 192 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
900 ms · 150 KiBAbout 150 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
250 ms · 89 KiB4 images could be 89 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
250 ms · 16 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 16 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 193 KiB and 151 ms of main-thread time.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 168 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 18 KiB18 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 60 but mobile only 34. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.7 s
A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 429 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 101 ms
101 msYour server sent the HTML in 101 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.9 s
8.9 sYour largest element takes 8.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Speed Index: 11.7 s
11.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.546
0.546The layout shifts by 0.546 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sThe first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 8.9 s
8.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 8.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
32 images without width and height
32 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 105 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 106 ms
106 msReal visitors wait 106 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.06
0.06For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 194 ms
194 msScripts block the page for only 194 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
1 image far larger than shown
37 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example enabling-world-map-q4-2025.webp at 1,920 px wide, shown at 324 px. Resized copies would save about 37 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (67 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (91 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.46 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.46 g of CO₂e: 55.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 1.6 MB in 108 requests
1.6 MBYour homepage downloads 1.6 MB in 108 requests on a phone: scripts 542 KiB (31), images 480 KiB (27) and fonts 380 KiB (8). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
14 text elements with low contrast
14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (25 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 25 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
34 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (234 characters)
Your meta description is 234 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at enabling.ch/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
40 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 40 pages on enabling.ch and 9 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Moving Money to Meaning”.
Title: 40 characters
Your title is a healthy 40 characters: “Enabling Qapital Ltd. | Impact Investing”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://enabling.ch/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://enabling.ch/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (400 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
/about-eq and /news have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
/news has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages slow to respond
/impact/access-to-energy, /about-eq, /about-eq/our-people and /news took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
6 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (enabling.ch).
Valid certificate (84 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for enabling.ch and is valid for another 84 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://enabling.ch redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 32 links work
All 32 links checked from your homepage (27 internal, 5 external) answered without errors; 26 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
enabling.ch has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 309 words of copy
The homepage carries about 309 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 16 customer or partner logos, 1 trust badge and “over 65 members”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 mx a:mail68.atl51.rsgsv.net ip4:91.235.138.48 include:spf.eu.signature365.net ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- Joomla
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 35 issues on enabling.ch, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.