Website review, no card needed
envagor.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 13 November 202637 issues · 76 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on envagor.com, 13 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 46.6 MB in 190 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71C- #88,601 of 109,350 reviewed websitesbeats 16%
- #54,281 of 61,859 online storesbeats 10%
- #1,816 of 2,524 WooCommerce storesbeats 24%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.8 s69 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.
Mobile performance score: 45
45/100Your mobile performance score is 45. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 45.0 MB138 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (45.0 MB).
Improve image delivery
600 ms · 163 KiB4 images could be 163 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, WordPress and Facebook and others), adding 1.1 MB and 454 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
337 KiBAbout 337 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 36 KiBAbout 36 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 237 ms
237 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 237 ms of main-thread work and 453 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.3 s
A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 758 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
WordPress adds 114 ms
114 msWordPress costs a phone 114 ms of main-thread work and 364 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 33 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 104 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
31 KiB31 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 60 ms
60 msYour server sent the HTML in 60 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Speed Index: 9.2 s
9.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.9 s
5.9 sYour largest element takes 5.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Envagor banner- Sakshi (34)”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.487
0.487The layout shifts by 0.487 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 11.2 s
11.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
1 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 56 ms
56 msScripts block the page for only 56 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 46.6 MB in 190 requests
46.6 MBYour homepage downloads 46.6 MB in 190 requests on a phone: media 44.8 MB (8), scripts 1.1 MB (85) and images 415 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 13.2 g of CO₂ per visit
13.22 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 13.22 g of CO₂e: 1585.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (82 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 82 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
69 internal links, 13 external
The homepage links to 69 pages on envagor.com and 13 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 121 characters
Your meta description is 121 characters: “Discover oversized T-shirts, cargo denims, and plazzos by Envagor. Effortless style, relaxed fits, and modern streetwea…”.
Title: 42 characters
Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “Envagor® | Oversized Streetwear Essentials”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://envagor.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://envagor.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (404 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://envagor.com/llms.txt (21 KiB, 43 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://envagor.com/shop-page/swoof/price-149-to-999 is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
https://envagor.com/shop-page and https://envagor.com/shop-page/swoof/price-149-to-999 all use the title “Envagor® Shop | Oversized T-Shirts, Denims, Plazzos & Perfumes”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
10 pages without a meta description
https://envagor.com/shop, https://envagor.com/product/mens-graphic-t-shirt-thinking-print, https://envagor.com/product/baggy-denim-white-jeans-dripp-series, https://envagor.com/product/baggy-denim-grey-jeans-dripp-series, https://envagor.com/product/plazzo-cling-series-mango and https://envagor.com/product/plazzo-sena-series-brown and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://envagor.com/shop-page and https://envagor.com/shop-page/swoof/price-149-to-999 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
6 pages without an H1
https://envagor.com/shop-page, https://envagor.com/perfume, https://envagor.com/women, https://envagor.com/men, https://envagor.com/shop-page/swoof/price-149-to-999 and https://envagor.com/about-us have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
17 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 19 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 363 words of copy
The homepage carries about 363 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Shop” and “Contact”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
26 cookies set on arrival
26Opening the homepage sets 26 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at envagor.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Hostinger
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on envagor.com, including 15 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.