Website review, no card needed
envelopes.sg website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202633 issues · 79 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on envelopes.sg, 9 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
88B- #5,228 of 108,860 reviewed websitesbeats 93%
- #2,908 of 61,765 online storesbeats 93%
- #2,825 of 56,365 Shopify storesbeats 92%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 159 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 8.0 s
A phone's processor spends 8.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 79
79/100Your mobile performance score is 79. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 709 KiB and 771 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
350 ms · 74 KiB3 images could be 74 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Clarity adds 369 ms
369 msClarity costs a phone 369 ms of main-thread work and 30 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
300 ms7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
222 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (222 KiB).
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 208 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused JavaScript
82 KiBAbout 82 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Reduce unused CSS
16 KiBAbout 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
14 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 14 ms
14 msYour server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 11.5 s
11.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.4 s
4.4 sYour largest element takes 4.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors
+43%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 116 ms to 159 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 937 ms
937 msReal visitors wait 937 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 4.2 s
4.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 159 ms
159 msReal visitors wait 159 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 129 ms
129 msScripts block the page for only 129 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.6 MB in 399 requests
2.6 MBYour homepage downloads 2.6 MB in 399 requests on a phone: other files 1.3 MB (259), scripts 738 KiB (64) and images 290 KiB (53). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Crinkle-Paper-Homepage-Banner-Mobile-2.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image far larger than shown
49 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Lempac_Logo_Singapore.png at 2,260 px wide, shown at 184 px. Resized copies would save about 49 KiB.
About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit
0.72 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.72 g of CO₂e: 86.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
15 links without text
15 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (4 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: sameAs is an empty list”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
168 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 168 pages on envelopes.sg and 4 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 139 characters
Your meta description is 139 characters: “Your global supplier for envelopes, coloured padded bags and postal packaging. Explore our extensive in-stock range and…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “The greatest stocked range of envelopes and postal packaging products in the World”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Global Envelope & Postal Packaging Supplier | Lempac”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.lempac.com/en-sg.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lempac.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,098 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.lempac.com/llms.txt (168 KiB, 324 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.lempac.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.lempac.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.lempac.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.lempac.com/customer_authentication/redirect and https://www.lempac.com/en-sg/products/glassine-envelopes have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 114 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'nextElementSibling')”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
56 of 57 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
About 770 words of copy
The homepage carries about 770 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join & Get 30% OFF” and “Shop Protective Packaging”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Book Wraps”, “Join & Get 30% OFF” and “Shop Protective Packaging”.
35 short forms
35 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
29 cookies set on arrival
29Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies, 9 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
39 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 39 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at envelopes.sg, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify;Shopify Plus
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on envelopes.sg, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.