Website review, no card needed

environmentallights.com logo

environmentallights.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202648 issues · 116 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on environmentallights.com, 18 of them high impact, across 116 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.5 sMay 2Oct 171.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.7 s
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
144 ms108 msMay 2Oct 17140 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026122 ms
May 9, 2026116 ms
May 16, 2026112 ms
May 23, 2026116 ms
May 30, 2026116 ms
Jun 6, 2026113 ms
Jun 13, 2026119 ms
Jun 20, 2026112 ms
Jun 27, 2026112 ms
Jul 4, 2026116 ms
Jul 11, 2026114 ms
Jul 18, 2026116 ms
Jul 25, 2026121 ms
Aug 1, 2026121 ms
Aug 8, 2026121 ms
Aug 15, 2026126 ms
Aug 22, 2026123 ms
Aug 29, 2026130 ms
Sep 5, 2026133 ms
Sep 12, 2026131 ms
Sep 19, 2026136 ms
Sep 26, 2026131 ms
Oct 3, 2026137 ms
Oct 10, 2026139 ms
Oct 17, 2026140 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of environmentallights.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. environmentallights.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. environmentallights.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  3. environmentallights.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  4. environmentallights.com at 5.2 s5.2 s
  5. environmentallights.com at 6.5 s6.5 s
  6. environmentallights.com at 7.8 s7.8 s
  7. environmentallights.com at 9.1 s9.1 s
  8. environmentallights.com at 10.4 s10.4 s

environmentallights.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

14 to fix19
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Google CDN adds 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Google CDN costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 2.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 14.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 14.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 9.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 19

    19/100

    Your mobile performance score is 19 (desktop: 77). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and CallRail and others), adding 3.7 MB and 3.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 MB

    About 1.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 873 ms

    873 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 873 ms of main-thread work and 503 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 124 KiB

    About 124 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    714 KiB

    11 images could be 714 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 589 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • CallRail adds 362 ms

    362 ms

    CallRail costs a phone 362 ms of main-thread work and 25 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 341 ms

    341 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 341 ms of main-thread work and 213 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 315 ms

    315 ms

    Other Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 315 ms of main-thread work and 217 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    294 KiB

    27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (294 KiB).

  • Document request latency

    109 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    47 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 77 but mobile only 19. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 36 ms

    36 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 36 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 35.5 s

    35.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 35.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.0 s

    14.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Your largest element takes 6.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Eluxtra ProFlex”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.265

    0.265

    The layout shifts by 0.265 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.20

    0.20

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.20 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 835 ms

    835 ms

    Real visitors wait 835 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 20 images without width and height

    20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors

    +17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 122 ms to 140 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 150 ms

    150 ms

    Real visitors wait 150 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 7.2 MB in 398 requests

    7.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.2 MB in 398 requests on a phone: scripts 3.9 MB (282), images 1.3 MB (43) and other files 1.1 MB (42). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    122 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example REVI-Carousel-1280x1026_2.jpg at 1,280 px wide, shown at 340 px. Resized copies would save about 122 KiB.

  • About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.04 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.04 g of CO₂e: 244.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8591
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid names (2 elements)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid names: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 9 text elements with low contrast

    9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links must have discernible text (7 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 form fields without a label

    6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 49 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 8370
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (75 characters)

    Your title is 75 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “LED Lights, Drivers, Controllers and Custom Lighting | Environmental Lights”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 8 links with vague text

    8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 126 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 126 pages on environmentallights.com and 0 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 150 characters

    Your meta description is 150 characters: “We transform environments by engineering our customers’ visions into innovative lighting solutions using LED lights, ch…”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.environmentallights.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix70
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Parts of the site are closed to 6 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,145 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 6 pages without a meta description

    /account-request, /exhibit-led-lighting, /hospitality-led-lighting, /audio-visual-led-lighting, /led-strip-lights/single-color-led-strip-light.html and /led-neon/tunable-white-led-neon.html have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /led-strip-lights.html and /led-neon.html have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 87 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 92100
  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    101 of 108 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (environmentallights.com).

  • Valid certificate (73 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for environmentallights.com and is valid for another 73 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://environmentallights.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 40 links work

    All 40 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    environmentallights.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    environmentallights.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 20 years old

    20 years

    environmentallights.com was registered in May 2006 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until May 2027

    environmentallights.com is registered until May 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 907 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 907 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Ready To Start A Project?”.

  • 16 calls to action

    The homepage has 16 calls to action, for example “Request an Account”, “Contact Us” and “Ready To Start A Project?”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 9 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Email authentication

1 to fix75
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be environmentallights.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 75/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a:dispatch-us.ppe-hosted.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com include:_spf.sa…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 26 cookies set on arrival

    26

    Opening the homepage sets 26 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

E-commerce
Magento
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 48 issues on environmentallights.com, including 24 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25