Website review, no card needed
eqlwiki.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202639 issues · 76 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on eqlwiki.com, 10 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 431 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 406 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 484 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 583 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 605 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 611 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 571 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 533 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 476 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 472 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 474 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 477 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 477 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 478 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 484 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 556 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 617 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 677 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 786 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 787 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 780 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 783 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 786 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 55 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 53 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 70 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 76 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
5.5 s · 2.2 MB10 images could be 2.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.5 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
900 ms · 302 KiB15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (302 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 67
67/100Your mobile performance score is 67 (desktop: 99). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
450 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 62 KiBAbout 62 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 44 KiBAbout 44 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 51 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 99 but mobile only 67. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.4 s
A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 146 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.7 s
10.7 sYour largest element takes 10.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 11.0 s
11.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.7 s
6.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 41% slower for real visitors
+41%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 55 ms to 76 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 87% slower for real visitors
+87%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.4 s to 0.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 85 ms
85 msReal visitors wait 85 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 502 ms
502 msReal visitors wait 502 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.008
0.008The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.008, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 1 ms
1 msScripts block the page for only 1 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.6 MB in 22 requests
2.6 MBYour homepage downloads 2.6 MB in 22 requests on a phone: images 2.3 MB (14), scripts 188 KiB (3) and stylesheets 61 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
9 images in older formats
9 images (548 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images far larger than shown
41 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example [email protected] at 200 px wide, shown at 60 px. Resized copies would save about 41 KiB.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (215 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit
0.73 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.73 g of CO₂e: 88.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
57 tap targets too small
57 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
9 images without alt text
9 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (9 elements).
1 checks passed
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (22 characters)
Your title is only 22 characters: “EverQuest Legends Wiki”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://eqlwiki.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at eqlwiki.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
109 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 109 pages on eqlwiki.com and 9 external pages.
1 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Main Page”.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (905 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 linked pages hidden from search
/Special:Search, /Special:WhatLinksHere/Main_Page, /Special:RecentChangesLinked/Main_Page, /Special:MyTalk and /Special:MyContributions are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
/Main_Page and / all use the title “EverQuest Legends Wiki”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
/Special:Search, /Talk:Main_Page, /Special:WhatLinksHere/Main_Page, /Special:RecentChangesLinked/Main_Page, /Special:MyTalk and /Special:MyContributions and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /Quests, whose canonical is /Category:Quests. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 78 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
73 small tap targets
73 of 94 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 785 words of copy
The homepage carries about 785 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at eqlwiki.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- MediaWiki 1.45.3
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 39 issues on eqlwiki.com, including 11 speed issues, 9 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.