esslsecurity.com website review

About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.3 s faster on a phone.

41 images could be 5.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 51). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

6 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 2.2 MB and 721 ms of main-thread time.

YouTube costs a phone 623 ms of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 450 ms.

About 99 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1 KiB).

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

Your largest element takes 20.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “eSSL NSDL Registered Biometric Device”.

The page becomes fully interactive after 34.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 12.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

The first text or image appears after 6.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

Real visitors wait 916 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

88 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 117 ms to 119 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 7.8 MB in 87 requests on a phone: images 5.4 MB (48), scripts 1.9 MB (13) and stylesheets 173 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

5 images weigh 4.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Expo-1.jpg at 3,508 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 4.2 MB.

6 images (4.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

13 images further down the page (287 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.21 g of CO₂e: 265.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

44 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Biometric Attendance & Access Control Systems India | eSSL Security”.

The homepage links to 342 pages on esslsecurity.com and 15 external pages.

There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

/hid, /nfc, /software-integration and /fingerprint/vegawpoe have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

/hid, /nfc, /software-integration, /careers, /contactus and /fingerprint/x990 and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

8 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.youtube.com/@esslsecurity (404).

No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.

1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://facebook.com/esslsecurity/.

X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

esslsecurity.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

esslsecurity.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

The homepage has only about 227 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be esslsecurity.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.