Website review, no card needed

essind.com logo

essind.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202637 issues · 99 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on essind.com, 15 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.3 s4.3 sMay 2Oct 175.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20264.4 s
May 9, 20264.4 s
May 16, 20264.5 s
May 23, 20264.6 s
May 30, 20264.6 s
Jun 6, 20264.6 s
Jun 13, 20264.7 s
Jun 20, 20264.7 s
Jun 27, 20264.6 s
Jul 4, 20264.5 s
Jul 11, 20264.5 s
Jul 18, 20264.5 s
Jul 25, 20264.6 s
Aug 1, 20264.9 s
Aug 8, 20264.8 s
Aug 15, 20264.8 s
Aug 22, 20264.8 s
Aug 29, 20264.9 s
Sep 5, 20264.9 s
Sep 12, 20265.1 s
Sep 19, 20265.1 s
Sep 26, 20265.1 s
Oct 3, 20265.2 s
Oct 10, 20265.1 s
Oct 17, 20265.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
104 ms79 msMay 2Oct 1785 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202686 ms
May 9, 202682 ms
May 16, 202686 ms
May 23, 202687 ms
May 30, 202696 ms
Jun 6, 202698 ms
Jun 13, 2026101 ms
Jun 20, 202697 ms
Jun 27, 202689 ms
Jul 4, 202682 ms
Jul 11, 202683 ms
Jul 18, 202683 ms
Jul 25, 202684 ms
Aug 1, 202687 ms
Aug 8, 202694 ms
Aug 15, 202694 ms
Aug 22, 202696 ms
Aug 29, 202698 ms
Sep 5, 202692 ms
Sep 12, 202694 ms
Sep 19, 202690 ms
Sep 26, 202688 ms
Oct 3, 202688 ms
Oct 10, 202685 ms
Oct 17, 202685 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

8 to fix56
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.5 s

    49 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.5 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 424 KiB

    About 424 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.2 s · 972 KiB

    4 images could be 972 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 68). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, WordPress Site Stats and Fastest Forward and others), adding 2.8 MB and 227 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 62 KiB

    About 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • WordPress adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    WordPress costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 2.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,888 HTML elements

    The page has 1,888 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 172 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    8 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 821 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 84 ms

    84 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 84 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Real visitors wait 4.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors wait 3.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.8 s

    22.8 s

    Your largest element takes 22.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.5 s

    23.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.3 s

    11.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 86 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.4 s to 5.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 79 ms

    79 ms

    Real visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 137 ms

    137 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 137 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 6.6 MB in 134 requests

    6.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 134 requests on a phone: images 5.1 MB (29), scripts 931 KiB (45) and fonts 332 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.86 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.86 g of CO₂e: 223.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8675
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Skip links are not focusable.

    Skip links are not focusable. (1 element).

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (9 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 9 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 12 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 9 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9283
  • Title is short (27 characters)

    Your title is only 27 characters: “Home - Essential Industries”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“INNOVATION IS ESSENTIAL” and “Blog Posts”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (221 characters)

    Your meta description is 221 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 320 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 320 pages on essind.com and 13 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.essind.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.essind.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 6 pages without a meta description

    /product-category/resilient-floor-cleaner, /product-category/resilient-floor-strippers, /product-category/resilient-floor-restorers, /product-category/concrete-and-terrazzo, /product-category/disinfectants and /product-category/food-service have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 pages share a meta description

    /pfas-nia-products, /the-superbase-concentrate-system, /how-to-buy, /contact, /contact/careers and /shop use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages slow to respond

    /pfas-nia-products, /the-superbase-concentrate-system, /how-to-buy, /contact, /contact/careers and /shop and 9 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 79 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9692
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://instagram.com/essentialindustriesinc.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (essind.com).

  • Valid certificate (75 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR1 verifies for essind.com and is valid for another 75 days.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://essind.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 48 links work

    All 48 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 8 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

1 to fix
  • Domain expires in 81 days

    essind.com is registered until Jan 2027. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.

  • No CAA record

    essind.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    essind.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

1 checks passed
  • Domain is 29 years old

    29 years

    essind.com was registered in Jan 1997 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

Content and conversion

6 to fix65
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 14 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 33 words

    The homepage has only about 33 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “How to Buy”, “Contact” and “Contact Us”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

Email authentication

1 to fix80
  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 80/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf-us.ppe-hosted.com a mx include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:essentialpolymers.com include:ama…”.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It runs WordPress 1.14.2; the current release is 7.1.3.
  • 5 plugins are behind their latest release.contact-form-7 6.1.7 → 6.2.2 · cookie-law-info 3.5.6 → 3.5.7 · woocommerce 11.1.2 → 11.2.1 · elementor 4.3.3 → 4.3.5 · jquery-updater 3.5.2 → 4.0.0

Stack

CMS
WordPress 1.14.2
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 37 issues on essind.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25