Website review, no card needed

everymatrix.com logo

everymatrix.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202624 issues · 95 checks

This review found 24 issues worth fixing on everymatrix.com, 4 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.6 s2.0 sMay 9Oct 242.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.0 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.4 s
May 30, 20263.6 s
Jun 6, 20263.9 s
Jun 13, 20264.2 s
Jun 20, 20264.1 s
Jun 27, 20264.1 s
Jul 4, 20264.2 s
Jul 11, 20264.3 s
Jul 18, 20264.3 s
Jul 25, 20264.3 s
Aug 1, 20264.1 s
Aug 8, 20263.7 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
180 ms125 msMay 9Oct 24145 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026147 ms
May 16, 2026146 ms
May 23, 2026160 ms
May 30, 2026164 ms
Jun 6, 2026169 ms
Jun 13, 2026174 ms
Jun 20, 2026150 ms
Jun 27, 2026144 ms
Jul 4, 2026146 ms
Jul 11, 2026137 ms
Jul 18, 2026137 ms
Jul 25, 2026142 ms
Aug 1, 2026145 ms
Aug 8, 2026150 ms
Aug 15, 2026152 ms
Aug 22, 2026156 ms
Aug 29, 2026157 ms
Sep 5, 2026153 ms
Sep 12, 2026155 ms
Sep 19, 2026143 ms
Sep 26, 2026142 ms
Oct 3, 2026134 ms
Oct 10, 2026131 ms
Oct 17, 2026143 ms
Oct 24, 2026145 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

6 to fix83
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 427 KiB

    About 427 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 83

    83/100

    Your mobile performance score is 83 (desktop: 98). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    550 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 550 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    302 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (302 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 143 ms

    143 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 143 ms of main-thread work and 316 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,517 HTML elements

    The page has 1,517 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and termly.io and others), adding 702 KiB and 310 ms of main-thread time.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 122 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    25 KiB

    1 image could be 25 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 538 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 38 ms

    38 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 38 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.8 s

    9.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Your largest element takes 3.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Homepage Hero Background”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.0 s).

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 147 ms to 145 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 150 ms

    150 ms

    Real visitors wait 150 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 23% faster for real visitors

    -23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 143 ms

    143 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 143 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.3 MB in 72 requests

    2.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 72 requests on a phone: media 1,018 KiB (2), scripts 938 KiB (10) and images 155 KiB (48). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.65 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.65 g of CO₂e: 77.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9395
  • 21 tap targets too small

    21 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 12 text elements with low contrast

    12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 67 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 99 internal links, 22 external

    The homepage links to 99 pages on everymatrix.com and 22 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 149 characters

    Your meta description is 149 characters: “B2B iGaming software provider for casino, sportsbook, lottery, payments, content, compliance and managed services ✓ Ful…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “EveryMatrix is an iGaming platform & software solutions provider for industry leaders”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “B2B iGaming Software & Sports Betting Platform Provider”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://everymatrix.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://everymatrix.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,235 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 4 pages slow to respond

    /casinoengine, /engagesuite, /games and /services took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 57 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    7 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 7 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 7 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.gamingcommission.gov.gr/index.php/en/.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (everymatrix.com).

  • Valid certificate (29 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · DigiCert Global G3 TLS ECC SHA384 2020 CA1 verifies for everymatrix.com and is valid for another 29 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://everymatrix.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 57 links work

    All 57 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 17 external) answered without errors; 3 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    everymatrix.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 17 years old

    17 years

    everymatrix.com was registered in Jul 2009 through DNC Holdings, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • DNSSEC is on

    everymatrix.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

  • Registered until Jul 2029

    everymatrix.com is registered until Jul 2029.

Content and conversion

2 to fix80
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,066 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,066 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get in touch”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Get in touch” and “Talk to an expert”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 5 trust badges and “400+ CLIENTS”.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:85.9.7.222/32 ip4:194.105.142.0/24 ip4:109.205.92.0/24 ip4:109.205.93.0/24 ip4:85.9.28.0/24 ip4:205.201.128.…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector2”, “k1” and “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
Tailwind CSS
Hosting
Akamai

Company

Founded
2008
Headquarters
St. Julian's

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 24 issues on everymatrix.com, including 14 speed issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25