Website review, no card needed

evolveip.net logo

evolveip.net website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202641 issues · 115 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on evolveip.net, 14 of them high impact, across 115 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.0 sMay 9Oct 242.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
181 ms100 msMay 9Oct 24150 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026135 ms
May 16, 2026141 ms
May 23, 2026136 ms
May 30, 2026134 ms
Jun 6, 2026113 ms
Jun 13, 2026109 ms
Jun 20, 2026111 ms
Jun 27, 2026111 ms
Jul 4, 2026111 ms
Jul 18, 2026110 ms
Jul 25, 2026113 ms
Aug 1, 2026119 ms
Aug 8, 2026147 ms
Aug 15, 2026159 ms
Aug 22, 2026172 ms
Aug 29, 2026171 ms
Sep 5, 2026170 ms
Sep 12, 2026138 ms
Sep 19, 2026127 ms
Sep 26, 2026130 ms
Oct 3, 2026132 ms
Oct 10, 2026143 ms
Oct 17, 2026138 ms
Oct 24, 2026150 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

10 to fix54
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Main-thread work: 5.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and hsappstatic.net and others), adding 3.5 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 MB

    About 1.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    250 ms · 1.0 MB

    93 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.0 MB).

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 640 ms

    640 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 640 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 449 ms

    449 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 449 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • hsappstatic.net adds 295 ms

    295 ms

    hsappstatic.net costs a phone 295 ms of main-thread work and 801 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • FontAwesome CDN adds 141 ms

    141 ms

    FontAwesome CDN costs a phone 141 ms of main-thread work and 315 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 233 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    66 KiB

    7 images could be 66 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    62 KiB

    About 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    24 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.0 s

    30.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Your largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “An AI-First Managed IT Partner That Thinks The Way You Do W…”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 783 ms

    783 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 783 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 45 images without width and height

    45 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 135 ms to 150 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 675 ms

    675 ms

    Real visitors wait 675 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.013

    0.013

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.013, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 6.2 MB in 243 requests

    6.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.2 MB in 243 requests on a phone: scripts 3.3 MB (56), media 1.1 MB (1) and fonts 591 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    New MNS graphic for homepage marquee (3).png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.75 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.75 g of CO₂e: 209.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 8089
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    6 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (6 elements)

    Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h1 → h4 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 56 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 66 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 56 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8593
  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“An AI-First Managed IT Partner That Thinks The Wa…”, “AI That Moves From Pilot to Production” and “Managed Networks With AI-Driven Visibility”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 99 internal links, 3 external

    The homepage links to 99 pages on evolveip.net and 3 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 158 characters

    Your meta description is 158 characters: “XTIUM amplifies your IT team with AI-powered, secure, scalable solutions for virtual desktops, security, communications…”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “XTIUM: Managed IT Solutions That Work—Secure & Scalable”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://xtium.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, VideoObject and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://xtium.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Parts of the site are closed to 5 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,896 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 1 page slow to respond

    /exposure-management-security-operation took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 40 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7370
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=97178604&Ver=2&mid=bbce4828-6034-4540-b364-8e1b602edf45&bo=1&sid=b50d5220d37811f19484ddd4a6a75303&vid=b50d8ee0d37811f1b63921e27c67f64b&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.

  • 11 small tap targets

    11 of 21 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “VIDEOJS: ERROR: (CODE:2 MEDIA_ERR_NETWORK) A network error caused the media download to fail part-way. [object Iu]”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://evolveip.net goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (xtium.com).

  • Valid certificate (31 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for evolveip.net and is valid for another 31 days.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://evolveip.net redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 43 links work

    All 43 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 3 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    xtium.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    xtium.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 22 years old

    22 years

    xtium.com was registered in Sep 2004 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Sep 2027

    xtium.com is registered until Sep 2027.

Content and conversion

3 to fix81
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,831 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,831 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Schedule a Call” and “Start Moving at the Speed of AI”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Contact Center”, “Schedule a Call” and “Get your freeAI Readiness Assessment >”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 20 testimonial or review blocks and 14 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and HubSpot.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a mx ip4:208.89.20.186 ip4:208.89.21.185 ip4:208.89.20.166 ip4:64.27.41.70 ip4:208.89.20.143 ip4:208.89.20.78 ip…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 50 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 50 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
HubSpot
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
HubSpot

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on evolveip.net, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25