Website review, no card needed

excella.com logo

excella.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202636 issues · 102 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on excella.com, 14 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 48. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s1.5 sMay 9Oct 242.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
100 ms61 msMay 9Oct 2479 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202679 ms
May 30, 202677 ms
Jun 6, 202692 ms
Jun 13, 202689 ms
Jun 20, 202687 ms
Jun 27, 202695 ms
Jul 4, 202690 ms
Jul 11, 202694 ms
Jul 18, 202678 ms
Jul 25, 202670 ms
Aug 1, 202670 ms
Aug 8, 202665 ms
Aug 15, 202670 ms
Aug 22, 202670 ms
Aug 29, 202670 ms
Sep 5, 202672 ms
Sep 12, 202679 ms
Oct 3, 202684 ms
Oct 17, 202681 ms
Oct 24, 202679 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of excella.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. excella.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. excella.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. excella.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. excella.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. excella.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. excella.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. excella.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. excella.com at 3.2 s3.2 s

excella.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

7 to fix48
  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    4.9 MB

    11 images could be 4.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    940 ms · 383 KiB

    About 383 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 940 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and Hubspot and others), adding 1,009 KiB and 914 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    600 ms · 162 KiB

    14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (162 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 681 ms

    681 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 681 ms of main-thread work and 640 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 234 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    62 KiB

    About 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    28 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 28 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 25.1 s

    25.1 s

    Your largest element takes 25.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.8 s

    28.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 605 ms

    605 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 605 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 11 images without width and height

    11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 79 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 79 ms

    79 ms

    Real visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.04

    0.04

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.04, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 8.5 MB in 74 requests

    8.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.5 MB in 74 requests on a phone: images 7.4 MB (26), scripts 1,021 KiB (26) and stylesheets 57 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    businessman-presenting-code-to-peers-photo.jpg.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    202 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example businessman-presenting-code-to-peers-photo.jpg.webp at 2,121 px wide, shown at 297 px. Resized copies would save about 202 KiB.

  • About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.42 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.42 g of CO₂e: 290.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8491
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 10 text elements with low contrast

    10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 16 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8578
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (7 characters)

    Your title is only 7 characters: “Excella”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 5 links with vague text

    5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 61 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 61 pages on excella.com and 5 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Solve for Today. Evolve for Tomorrow.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.excella.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Article, Organization, Person, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.excella.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (647 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    /insights has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /careers/current-opportunities has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    /careers/current-opportunities took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9686
  • Scrolls sideways on phones

    On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.

  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 33 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix83
  • 1 broken link to your own pages

    1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.excella.com/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection (404).

  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.linkedin.com/in/jgallimore/ (999).

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (excella.com).

  • Valid certificate (38 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for excella.com and is valid for another 38 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://excella.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

4 checks passed
  • Domain is 21 years old

    21 years

    excella.com was registered in Oct 2005 through Cloudflare, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only ssl.com, comodoca.com, digicert.com and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for excella.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • DNSSEC is on

    excella.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

  • Registered until Oct 2028

    excella.com is registered until Oct 2028.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,077 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,077 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “AI and Analytics Learn More” and “Modern Software Delivery Learn More”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_u.excella.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector2”, “k1” and “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It runs WordPress 7.1.3; the current release is 7.1.4.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 7.1.3
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Hiring

Hiring
3 open roles
Teams
ConOps (3)
Job board
greenhouse

Company

Employees
555

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on excella.com, including 15 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25