Website review, no card needed
express.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202644 issues · 92 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on express.com, 19 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
58FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 437 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 438 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 438 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 438 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 430 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 421 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 413 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 419 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 424 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 438 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 447 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 462 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 466 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 464 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 470 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 454 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 448 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 454 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 454 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 465 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 474 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 477 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 471 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 475 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 472 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.7 s
2.5 s
3.4 s
4.2 s
5.1 s
5.9 s
6.8 s
express.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
7.0 s · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.0 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.8 s · 806 KiB40 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (806 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
4.5 s9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.5 s.
Mobile performance score: 19
19/100Your mobile performance score is 19 (desktop: 30). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.4 s
A phone's processor spends 7.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Curalate and Klarna and others), adding 1.9 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 791 ms
791 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 791 ms of main-thread work and 879 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Duplicated JavaScript
650 ms · 83 KiB83 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
50 ms · 474 KiB19 images could be 474 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 370 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,597 HTML elements
The page has 2,597 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 57 KiBAbout 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 27 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.6 s
4.6 sReal visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.31
0.31For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.31 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 27.7 s
27.7 sYour largest element takes 27.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Express and our third-party partners may use multiple types…”.
Time to Interactive: 28.5 s
28.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 28.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 15.3 s
15.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.6 s
6.6 sThe first text or image appears after 6.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.8 s
1.8 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.196
0.196The layout shifts by 0.196 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 437 ms to 472 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 172 ms
172 msReal visitors wait 172 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 726 ms
726 msReal visitors wait 726 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.3 MB in 227 requests
8.3 MBYour homepage downloads 8.3 MB in 227 requests on a phone: scripts 3.1 MB (92), images 2.4 MB (60) and media 2.2 MB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit
2.34 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.34 g of CO₂e: 281.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
1 checks passed
16 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 17 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 16 passed and 1 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
3 checks passed
Title: 34 characters
Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Express - Men's & Women's Clothing”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.express.com/siteindex.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Parts of the site are closed to 6 AI crawlers
Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Best practices
3 broken images
3 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://t.teads.tv/track?action=pageView&env=js-gtm&tag_version=8.14.1_bd426f7&provider=tag&buyer_pixel_id=13641&referer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.express.com%2F&user_session_id=200253eb-9f18-4f60-a89b-785a3e.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
7 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
http:// does not redirect
http://express.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (express.com).
Valid certificate (28 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for express.com and is valid for another 28 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
express.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
express.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 32 years old
32 yearsexpress.com was registered in Mar 1994 through MarkMonitor Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Mar 2028
express.com is registered until Mar 2028.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 119 words
The homepage has only about 119 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP WOMEN'S” and “SHOP MEN'S”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be express.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 exists:%{i}.spf.express.iphmx.com include:spf1.express.com include:spf2.express.com include:spf3.express.com ip4…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
50 cookies set on arrival
50Opening the homepage sets 50 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
81 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 81 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 44 issues on express.com, including 22 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.