Website review, no card needed

farhi.co.uk logo

farhi.co.uk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202636 issues · 88 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on farhi.co.uk, 13 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 4.5 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.0 sMay 23Nov 72.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Oct 31, 20262.1 s
Nov 7, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
179 ms110 msMay 23Nov 7171 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026119 ms
May 30, 2026118 ms
Jun 6, 2026123 ms
Jun 13, 2026136 ms
Jun 20, 2026130 ms
Jun 27, 2026134 ms
Jul 4, 2026129 ms
Jul 11, 2026129 ms
Jul 18, 2026139 ms
Jul 25, 2026134 ms
Aug 1, 2026147 ms
Aug 8, 2026136 ms
Aug 29, 2026136 ms
Sep 5, 2026160 ms
Sep 12, 2026166 ms
Sep 26, 2026159 ms
Oct 3, 2026160 ms
Oct 10, 2026153 ms
Oct 17, 2026148 ms
Oct 24, 2026144 ms
Oct 31, 2026153 ms
Nov 7, 2026171 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of farhi.co.uk (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. farhi.co.uk at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. farhi.co.uk at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. farhi.co.uk at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. farhi.co.uk at 3.3 s3.3 s
  5. farhi.co.uk at 4.1 s4.1 s
  6. farhi.co.uk at 4.9 s4.9 s
  7. farhi.co.uk at 5.8 s5.8 s
  8. farhi.co.uk at 6.6 s6.6 s

Speed

7 to fix72
  • Main-thread work: 4.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 72

    72/100

    Your mobile performance score is 72. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, csell.co and Shopify and others), adding 1.0 MB and 878 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    950 ms

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    200 ms · 517 KiB

    18 images could be 517 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    536 KiB

    About 536 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google CDN adds 236 ms

    236 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 236 ms of main-thread work and 298 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    214 KiB

    20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (214 KiB).

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 208 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    57 KiB

    About 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 71 ms

    71 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 71 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 11.0 s

    11.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Your largest element takes 5.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Tap response (INP) got 37% slower for real visitors

    +37%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 171 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 327 ms

    327 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 327 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 179 ms

    179 ms

    Real visitors wait 179 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 556 ms

    556 ms

    Real visitors wait 556 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.8 MB in 256 requests

    3.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.8 MB in 256 requests on a phone: images 1.5 MB (31), scripts 1.2 MB (84) and other files 831 KiB (108). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (257 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.08 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.08 g of CO₂e: 130.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 7284
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    2 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (2 elements)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (3 elements)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 42 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 11 failed. 7 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9286
  • Title is long (69 characters)

    Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Rita Farhi | Luxury Confectionery Gifts, Gourmet Hampers & Chocolates”.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“”, “CUSTOMER SERVICE” and “SATISFACTION GUARANTEE”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 169 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 169 pages on farhi.co.uk and 11 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “Discover Rita Farhi luxury confectionery gifts, gourmet hampers and premium chocolate selections. Perfect for every occ…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.farhi.co.uk/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.farhi.co.uk/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (971 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.farhi.co.uk/llms.txt (195 KiB, 453 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.farhi.co.uk/apps/box-builder/custom-hamper has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    https://www.farhi.co.uk/collections/all-chocolates, https://www.farhi.co.uk/collections/chocolate-covered-fruits and https://www.farhi.co.uk/collections/chocolate-coated-nuts use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://www.farhi.co.uk/apps/box-builder/custom-hamper, https://www.farhi.co.uk/collections/all-chocolates, https://www.farhi.co.uk/collections/white-chocolate, https://www.farhi.co.uk/collections/chocolate-covered-fruits and https://www.farhi.co.uk/collections/chocolate-coated-nuts have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 75 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.farhi.co.uk/.

  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix86
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • About 687 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 687 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Shop By Occasions”, “Shop By Recipient” and “Contact Us”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 31 testimonial or review blocks and 9 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Klaviyo and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 36 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 36 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at farhi.co.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 16 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Pandectes Gdpr · Inbox · Lipscore Reviews · Frequently Bought · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Google Youtube · Hulk Contact Us Form · Judge Me Reviews · Rez Preorder Back In Stock · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Apphero Free Gift · Easify Box Builder · hulkapps.com · trustpilot.com · csell.co · cloudfront.net

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
London

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on farhi.co.uk, including 13 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25