Website review, no card needed

fasbd.com logo

fasbd.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202645 issues · 97 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on fasbd.com, 18 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Live view · interaction off

Speed

9 to fix55
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    16.9 s · 3.3 MB

    40 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.3 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    8.8 s

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 8.8 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    6.4 s · 1.3 MB

    19 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    3.6 s · 601 KiB

    About 601 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    3.0 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 3.0 s).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.5 s · 436 KiB

    About 436 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Minify CSS

    720 ms · 135 KiB

    135 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 49 KiB

    49 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 30 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    55 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 53 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 1 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 235 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 549 ms

    549 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 549 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix67
  • First Contentful Paint: 24.9 s

    24.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 24.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 37.8 s

    37.8 s

    Your largest element takes 37.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We would like to know about your complain. Feel free to wri…”.

  • Speed Index: 25.7 s

    25.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 25.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 38.0 s

    38.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 38.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

2 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007

    0.007

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 6.3 MB in 51 requests

    6.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.3 MB in 51 requests on a phone: HTML 3.0 MB (2), images 1.8 MB (30) and scripts 699 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    70 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example fas-logo.png at 4,550 px wide, shown at 308 px. Resized copies would save about 70 KiB.

  • 8 images in older formats

    8 images (422 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.77 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.77 g of CO₂e: 212.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9398
  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 21 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

9 to fixGoogle 9152
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (24 characters)

    Your title is only 24 characters: “FAS Finance & Investment”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://fasbd.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at fasbd.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 85 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 85 pages on fasbd.com and 5 external pages.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

4 to fix58
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to /management-committee.html, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 15 pages share a title

    /, /vision-mission-objectives.html, /history.html, /professional-code-of-conduct.html, /awards-recognition.html and /branches-and-offices.html and 9 others all use the title “FAS Finance & Investment”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 14 pages without a meta description

    /vision-mission-objectives.html, /history.html, /professional-code-of-conduct.html, /awards-recognition.html, /branches-and-offices.html and /subsidiaries.html and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 14 pages without an H1

    /vision-mission-objectives.html, /history.html, /professional-code-of-conduct.html, /awards-recognition.html, /branches-and-offices.html and /subsidiaries.html and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    /audit-committee.html, /management-team.html and /corporate-finance.html took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 69 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

5 to fixGoogle 4669
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://fasbd.com/jpg.

  • 12 small tap targets

    12 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Mixed Content: The page at 'https://fasbd.com/' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure stylesheet 'http://fon…”.

  • 18 distorted images

    18 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

4 to fix57
  • 3 insecure resources on an https page

    3 resources load over plain http on your https page (for example http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato:300,400,400italic,600,700|Raleway:300,400,500,600,700|Crete+Round:400italic); browsers block or warn about them.

  • 1 broken link to your own pages

    1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://fasbd.com/management-committee.html (404).

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HTTP/1.1 only

    The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

3 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (fasbd.com).

  • Valid certificate (51 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for fasbd.com and is valid for another 51 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://fasbd.com redirects to the secure version.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    fasbd.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    fasbd.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 19 years old

    19 years

    fasbd.com was registered in Mar 2007 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Mar 2027

    fasbd.com is registered until Mar 2027.

Content and conversion

4 to fix58
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 67 words

    The homepage has only about 67 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact” and “Download”.

  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Download Corporate Profile”, “Short term loan (Against Work Order)” and “Call Money replacement”.

Email authentication

95
  • Email authentication score: 95/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:137.59.51.42 +ip4:137.59.51.45 ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “default” and “smtp”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Hosting
Bijoy Online Ltd. Multihome Internet Service Provider

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on fasbd.com, including 14 speed issues, 9 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25