Website review, no card needed

fast.co logo

fast.co website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202631 issues · 89 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on fast.co, 12 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
7.1 s4.9 sMay 16Oct 315.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20265.3 s
May 23, 20265.3 s
May 30, 20265.3 s
Jun 6, 20265.3 s
Jun 13, 20265.3 s
Jun 20, 20265.2 s
Jun 27, 20265.3 s
Jul 4, 20265.7 s
Jul 11, 20266.2 s
Jul 18, 20266.6 s
Jul 25, 20266.8 s
Aug 1, 20266.8 s
Aug 8, 20266.8 s
Aug 15, 20266.8 s
Aug 22, 20266.7 s
Aug 29, 20266.6 s
Sep 5, 20266.6 s
Sep 12, 20266.5 s
Sep 19, 20266.5 s
Sep 26, 20266.5 s
Oct 3, 20266.4 s
Oct 10, 20266.3 s
Oct 17, 20266.3 s
Oct 24, 20266.1 s
Oct 31, 20265.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
368 ms244 msMay 16Oct 31286 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026304 ms
May 23, 2026303 ms
May 30, 2026300 ms
Jun 6, 2026297 ms
Jun 13, 2026301 ms
Jun 20, 2026297 ms
Jun 27, 2026306 ms
Jul 4, 2026325 ms
Jul 11, 2026340 ms
Jul 18, 2026353 ms
Jul 25, 2026354 ms
Aug 1, 2026330 ms
Aug 8, 2026319 ms
Aug 15, 2026299 ms
Aug 22, 2026284 ms
Aug 29, 2026281 ms
Sep 5, 2026267 ms
Sep 12, 2026265 ms
Sep 19, 2026262 ms
Sep 26, 2026258 ms
Oct 3, 2026262 ms
Oct 10, 2026272 ms
Oct 17, 2026271 ms
Oct 24, 2026287 ms
Oct 31, 2026286 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of fast.co (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. fast.co at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. fast.co at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. fast.co at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. fast.co at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. fast.co at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. fast.co at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. fast.co at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. fast.co at 3.0 s3.0 s

fast.co does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

7 to fix64
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.1 s · 669 KiB

    About 669 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 64

    64/100

    Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Other Google APIs/SDKs and cdn-cookieyes.com and others), adding 1.1 MB and 609 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 566 ms

    566 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 566 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 81 KiB

    About 81 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 37 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 37 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 158 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 61 ms

    61 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 61 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 7.2 s

    7.2 s

    Real visitors wait 7.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 6.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Real visitors wait 5.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.1 s

    14.1 s

    Your largest element takes 14.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve p…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.5 s

    14.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 328 ms

    328 ms

    Real visitors wait 328 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 336 ms

    336 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 336 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 304 ms to 286 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors

    +12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.3 s to 5.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.7 MB in 74 requests

    2.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 74 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (33), fonts 758 KiB (9) and other files 363 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.76 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.76 g of CO₂e: 91.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9898
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 6 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9283
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (28 characters)

    Your title is only 28 characters: “Domain Inquiry | Markmonitor”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 28 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 28 pages on fast.co and 9 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “This Domain May Be For Sale”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.markmonitor.com/domain-inquiry/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.markmonitor.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    /category/blog, /category/datasheet, /category/news, /category/report and /category/webinar have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 14 small tap targets

    14 of 21 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (markmonitor.com).

  • Valid certificate (26 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · DigiCert EV RSA CA G2 verifies for fast.co and is valid for another 26 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://fast.co redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 34 links work

    All 34 links checked from your homepage (25 internal, 9 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    markmonitor.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 27 years old

    27 years

    markmonitor.com was registered in Apr 1999 through MarkMonitor Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only letsencrypt.org, pki.goog and digicert.com to issue certificates for markmonitor.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Apr 2032

    markmonitor.com is registered until Apr 2032.

Content and conversion

4 to fix64
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • A 13-field form

    Your longest form asks for 13 fields (11 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 91 words

    The homepage has only about 91 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.

  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight.

Email authentication

2 to fix0
  • No DMARC policy

    fast.co has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No SPF record

    fast.co has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Domain receives no email

    fast.co has no MX record, so it receives no email. SPF -all and DMARC reject still matter: they stop others sending mail as you.

  • Email authentication score: 0/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

  • 2 plugins are behind their latest release.download-monitor 5.3.0 → 5.3.6 · accessibility-widget 3.2.2 → 3.2.7

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on fast.co, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25