Website review, no card needed

fcjuarez.com logo

fcjuarez.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202645 issues · 104 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on fcjuarez.com, 18 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s2.6 sMay 2Oct 174.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.4 s
May 9, 20263.4 s
May 16, 20263.3 s
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.5 s
Jun 27, 20263.5 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.5 s
Sep 12, 20263.6 s
Sep 19, 20263.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.8 s
Oct 3, 20263.9 s
Oct 10, 20264.0 s
Oct 17, 20264.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
135 ms102 msMay 2Oct 17128 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026128 ms
May 9, 2026127 ms
May 16, 2026126 ms
May 23, 2026122 ms
May 30, 2026114 ms
Jun 6, 2026117 ms
Jun 13, 2026114 ms
Jun 20, 2026110 ms
Jun 27, 2026106 ms
Jul 4, 2026109 ms
Jul 11, 2026111 ms
Jul 18, 2026111 ms
Jul 25, 2026113 ms
Aug 1, 2026116 ms
Aug 8, 2026118 ms
Aug 15, 2026123 ms
Aug 22, 2026126 ms
Aug 29, 2026126 ms
Sep 5, 2026127 ms
Sep 12, 2026126 ms
Sep 19, 2026126 ms
Sep 26, 2026127 ms
Oct 3, 2026130 ms
Oct 10, 2026131 ms
Oct 17, 2026128 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of fcjuarez.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. fcjuarez.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. fcjuarez.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. fcjuarez.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. fcjuarez.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. fcjuarez.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. fcjuarez.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  7. fcjuarez.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  8. fcjuarez.com at 4.9 s4.9 s

fcjuarez.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

7 to fix57
  • Improve image delivery

    23.8 s · 7.7 MB

    17 images could be 7.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 23.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.7 s

    33 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.7 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 47). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 128 KiB

    About 128 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 330 ms

    330 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 330 ms of main-thread work and 301 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,262 HTML elements

    The page has 2,262 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 570 KiB and 461 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    160 ms · 194 KiB

    About 194 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 160 ms faster on a phone.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 113 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    10 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 139 ms

    139 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 139 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Real visitors wait 5.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 55.1 s

    55.1 s

    Your largest element takes 55.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Ver jugadores Button”.

  • Time to Interactive: 56.8 s

    56.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 56.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 20% slower for real visitors

    +20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 26 images without width and height

    26 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 237 ms

    237 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 237 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 128 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 113 ms

    113 ms

    Real visitors wait 113 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.01

    0.01

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.01, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

6 to fix29
  • Page weight: 12.3 MB in 141 requests

    12.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.3 MB in 141 requests on a phone: images 11.2 MB (52), scripts 671 KiB (37) and stylesheets 209 KiB (39). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 23 images in older formats

    23 images (3.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 22 images below the first screen load straight away

    22 images further down the page (1.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Sponsor-Juarez_1280x40px-rqsgj5suyq70bku25ci66moije2exjbe6ds is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    44 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example image_5e3604a5-removebg-preview.png at 594 px wide, shown at 190 px. Resized copies would save about 44 KiB.

  • About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.48 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.48 g of CO₂e: 417.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8190
  • 10 buttons without a name

    10 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 10 tap targets too small

    10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 49 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10076
  • Title is short (18 characters)

    Your title is only 18 characters: “Inicio - FC Juarez”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is short (14 characters)

    Your meta description is only 14 characters: “Ver más videos”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“EL EQUIPO DE LA FRONTERA” and “Conoce al equipo Varonil”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://fcjuarez.com/sitemap_index.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 34 internal links, 1,295 external

    The homepage links to 34 pages on fcjuarez.com and 1,295 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://fcjuarez.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Article, ImageObject, Organization, Person and WebPage.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,536 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 4 pages without a meta description

    /calendario-varonil, /tabla-de-posiciones-varonil, /calendario-femenil and /tabla-de-posiciones-femenil have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /bravos-saca-el-empate-en-su-visita-a-necaxa and /lista-de-convocados-jornada-14-apertura-2026 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    /calendario-varonil, /tabla-de-posiciones-varonil, /calendario-femenil, /tabla-de-posiciones-femenil and /noticias have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 18 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 27 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • HTTP/1.1 only

    The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example http://fcjuarez.com/nuestra-historia-varonil-2-2-2-2/.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (fcjuarez.com).

  • Valid certificate (36 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for fcjuarez.com and is valid for another 36 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://fcjuarez.com redirects to the secure version.

  • All 39 links work

    All 39 links checked from your homepage (19 internal, 20 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    fcjuarez.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    fcjuarez.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 11 years old

    11 years

    fcjuarez.com was registered in May 2015 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until May 2031

    fcjuarez.com is registered until May 2031.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 305 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 305 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “https://jousta.com/contact”, “https://www.nayyara.com/contact-us” and “https://cityengineering.co.tz/contact/”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Email authentication

1 to fix85
  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:secureserver.net ~all”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • 1 plugin is behind its latest release.elementor 4.3.3 → 4.3.5

Stack

CMS
WordPress 7.1.3
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
2015
Headquarters
Ciudad Juárez

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on fcjuarez.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25