Website review, no card needed
fcjuarez.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202645 issues · 104 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on fcjuarez.com, 18 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 126 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 122 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 128 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.8 s
2.5 s
3.1 s
3.7 s
4.3 s
4.9 s
fcjuarez.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Improve image delivery
23.8 s · 7.7 MB17 images could be 7.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 23.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.7 s33 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.7 s.
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 47). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 128 KiBAbout 128 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.7 s
A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 330 ms
330 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 330 ms of main-thread work and 301 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,262 HTML elements
The page has 2,262 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 570 KiB and 461 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
160 ms · 194 KiBAbout 194 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 160 ms faster on a phone.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 113 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Use efficient cache lifetimes
10 KiB1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 139 ms
139 msYour server sent the HTML in 139 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.5 s
5.5 sReal visitors wait 5.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 55.1 s
55.1 sYour largest element takes 55.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Ver jugadores Button”.
Time to Interactive: 56.8 s
56.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 56.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.7 s
7.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s
3.5 sThe first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 20% slower for real visitors
+20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
26 images without width and height
26 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 237 ms
237 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 237 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 128 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 113 ms
113 msReal visitors wait 113 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.01
0.01The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.01, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.3 MB in 141 requests
12.3 MBYour homepage downloads 12.3 MB in 141 requests on a phone: images 11.2 MB (52), scripts 671 KiB (37) and stylesheets 209 KiB (39). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
23 images in older formats
23 images (3.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
22 images below the first screen load straight away
22 images further down the page (1.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Sponsor-Juarez_1280x40px-rqsgj5suyq70bku25ci66moije2exjbe6ds is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
2 images far larger than shown
44 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example image_5e3604a5-removebg-preview.png at 594 px wide, shown at 190 px. Resized copies would save about 44 KiB.
About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit
3.48 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.48 g of CO₂e: 417.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
10 buttons without a name
10 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
10 tap targets too small
10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
12 links without text
12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 49 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (18 characters)
Your title is only 18 characters: “Inicio - FC Juarez”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is short (14 characters)
Your meta description is only 14 characters: “Ver más videos”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“EL EQUIPO DE LA FRONTERA” and “Conoce al equipo Varonil”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://fcjuarez.com/sitemap_index.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
34 internal links, 1,295 external
The homepage links to 34 pages on fcjuarez.com and 1,295 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://fcjuarez.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, ImageObject, Organization, Person and WebPage.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,536 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 pages without a meta description
/calendario-varonil, /tabla-de-posiciones-varonil, /calendario-femenil and /tabla-de-posiciones-femenil have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
/bravos-saca-el-empate-en-su-visita-a-necaxa and /lista-de-convocados-jornada-14-apertura-2026 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
5 pages without an H1
/calendario-varonil, /tabla-de-posiciones-varonil, /calendario-femenil, /tabla-de-posiciones-femenil and /noticias have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 18 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 small tap targets
6 of 27 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
HTTP/1.1 only
The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example http://fcjuarez.com/nuestra-historia-varonil-2-2-2-2/.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (fcjuarez.com).
Valid certificate (36 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for fcjuarez.com and is valid for another 36 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://fcjuarez.com redirects to the secure version.
All 39 links work
All 39 links checked from your homepage (19 internal, 20 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
fcjuarez.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
fcjuarez.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 11 years old
11 yearsfcjuarez.com was registered in May 2015 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until May 2031
fcjuarez.com is registered until May 2031.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 305 words of copy
The homepage carries about 305 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “https://jousta.com/contact”, “https://www.nayyara.com/contact-us” and “https://cityengineering.co.tz/contact/”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Email authentication
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:secureserver.net ~all”.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
14 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- 1 plugin is behind its latest release.elementor 4.3.3 → 4.3.5
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.3
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 2015
- Headquarters
- Ciudad Juárez
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on fcjuarez.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.