Website review, no card needed
fct.ca website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202635 issues · 107 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on fct.ca, 17 of them high impact, across 107 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 977 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 928 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 937 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 927 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 953 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 946 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 933 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 936 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 880 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 876 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 870 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 860 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 866 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 859 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 854 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 815 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 835 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 870 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 908 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 954 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 941 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 966 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 97 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 104 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.1 s
1.6 s
2.1 s
2.7 s
3.2 s
3.7 s
4.3 s
fct.ca does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.4 s · 455 KiB50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (455 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 559 KiBAbout 559 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s
1.0 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 879 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 43
43/100Your mobile performance score is 43. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.8 s
A phone's processor spends 4.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, reddit and Hubspot and others), adding 1.4 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 86 KiBAbout 86 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
401 KiB5 images could be 401 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
reddit adds 347 ms
347 msreddit costs a phone 347 ms of main-thread work and 36 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Hubspot adds 297 ms
297 msHubspot costs a phone 297 ms of main-thread work and 150 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 267 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
38 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 38 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 9 ms
9 msYour server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.4 s
11.4 sYour largest element takes 11.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Title Insurance, Real Estate and Recovery Solutions from FCT”.
Time to Interactive: 20.0 s
20.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 6.9 s
6.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.19
0.19For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.19 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 97 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors wait 0.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 103 ms
103 msReal visitors wait 103 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 0.8 s
0.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 341 ms
341 msReal visitors wait 341 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 18% faster for real visitors
-18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s
0.9 sThe first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.9 MB in 101 requests
2.9 MBYour homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 101 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (26), images 738 KiB (25) and fonts 589 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images far larger than shown
115 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example JOURNÉE INTERNATIONALE DES FEMMES (10).png at 1,200 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 115 KiB.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (229 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.81 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.81 g of CO₂e: 97.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
ARIA attributes must conform to valid names (7 elements)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid names: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (4 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
8 images without alt text
8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (7 elements).
1 checks passed
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
16 links with vague text
16 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
83 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 83 pages on fct.ca and 6 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 154 characters
Your meta description is 154 characters: “At FCT we offer innovative processing solutions and title insurance for every stage of the real estate lifecycle. Learn…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Title Insurance, Real Estate and Recovery Solutions from FCT”.
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Title Insurance, Real Estate and Recovery Solutions | FCT”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://fct.ca/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://fct.ca/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (794 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 pages share a meta description
/products/errors-and-omissions-insurance, /products/errors-and-omissions-insurance/extra, /products/errors-and-omissions-insurance/complete and /products/errors-and-omissions-insurance/deal-protection-endorsement use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 56 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (fct.ca).
Valid certificate (45 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for fct.ca and is valid for another 45 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://fct.ca redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 46 links work
All 46 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 6 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
4 checks passed
Domain is 17 years old
17 yearsfct.ca was registered in Mar 2009 through Go Daddy Domains Canada, Inc. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only digicert.com, sectigo.com, pki.goog and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for fct.ca, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
DNSSEC is on
fct.ca's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.
Registered until Mar 2034
fct.ca is registered until Mar 2034.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 944 words of copy
The homepage carries about 944 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
21 calls to action
The homepage has 21 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Learn more” and “Order title insurance”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Hotjar.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 mx a:mx1.hc332-44.ca.iphmx.com a:mx2.hc332-44.ca.iphmx.com a:mx0b-00128103.pphosted.com ip4:74.200.9.131/32 ip4:…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “s1”, “s2” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
32 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- HubSpot
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
- Hosting
- HubSpot
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on fct.ca, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.