Website review, no card needed
fingent.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202625 issues · 91 checks
This review found 25 issues worth fixing on fingent.com, 4 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 148 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 149 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 160 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
fingent.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.8 s41 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.
Reduce unused CSS
900 ms · 204 KiBAbout 204 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
2,120 HTML elements
The page has 2,120 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 76 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused JavaScript
23 KiBAbout 23 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 92
92/100Your mobile performance score is 92. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.5 s
A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 108 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 31 ms
31 msYour server sent the HTML in 31 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 235 ms
235 msReal visitors wait 235 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 4.5 s
4.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 4.2 s
4.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 4.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 148 ms to 160 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 37% faster for real visitors
-37%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.5 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sYour largest element renders in 2.4 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Fingent is an award-winning, ISO 27001–certified custom sof…”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 13 ms
13 msScripts block the page for only 13 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit
0.22 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.22 g of CO₂e: 26.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 804 KiB in 60 requests
804 KiBYour homepage downloads 804 KiB in 60 requests on a phone: stylesheets 306 KiB (41), fonts 244 KiB (4) and other files 103 KiB (5). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
15 text elements with low contrast
15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
8 images without alt text
8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (89 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 89 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
7 form fields without a label
7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“INNOVATION BEYOND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION” and “INNOVATION BEYOND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (257 characters)
Your meta description is 257 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
192 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 192 pages on fingent.com and 8 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 56 characters
Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Digital Transformation Services & Solutions | Fingent US”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.fingent.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: AggregateRating, BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.fingent.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Parts of the site are closed to 3 AI crawlers
Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.
3 checks passed
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,878 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (8 KiB, 94 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 80 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (fingent.com).
Valid certificate (44 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for fingent.com and is valid for another 44 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://fingent.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 47 links work
All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
fingent.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
fingent.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 23 years old
23 yearsfingent.com was registered in Feb 2003 through OnlineNIC, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Feb 2030
fingent.com is registered until Feb 2030.
Content and conversion
A 9-field form
Your longest form asks for 9 fields (3 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,008 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,008 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT”.
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Talk to Our AI Engineering Team” and “Contact Us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 78 customer or partner logos and a star rating.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be fingent.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org include:amazonses.com include:zcsend.in ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
- It loads jQuery 3.4.1, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 25 issues on fingent.com, including 11 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.