Website review, no card needed

fingent.com logo

fingent.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202625 issues · 91 checks

This review found 25 issues worth fixing on fingent.com, 4 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
7.1 s2.8 sMay 9Oct 244.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20265.5 s
May 16, 20266.5 s
May 23, 20266.6 s
May 30, 20265.9 s
Jun 6, 20264.7 s
Jun 13, 20264.3 s
Jun 20, 20264.0 s
Jun 27, 20264.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.9 s
Jul 11, 20263.8 s
Jul 18, 20263.6 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.3 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Aug 22, 20263.5 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.5 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20263.4 s
Sep 26, 20263.4 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Oct 24, 20264.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
173 ms144 msMay 9Oct 24160 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026148 ms
May 16, 2026154 ms
May 23, 2026149 ms
May 30, 2026149 ms
Jun 6, 2026155 ms
Jun 13, 2026154 ms
Jun 20, 2026157 ms
Jun 27, 2026160 ms
Jul 4, 2026160 ms
Jul 11, 2026160 ms
Jul 18, 2026156 ms
Jul 25, 2026153 ms
Aug 1, 2026150 ms
Aug 8, 2026147 ms
Aug 15, 2026151 ms
Aug 22, 2026155 ms
Aug 29, 2026160 ms
Sep 5, 2026160 ms
Sep 12, 2026160 ms
Sep 19, 2026157 ms
Sep 26, 2026161 ms
Oct 3, 2026168 ms
Oct 10, 2026170 ms
Oct 17, 2026169 ms
Oct 24, 2026160 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of fingent.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. fingent.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. fingent.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. fingent.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. fingent.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. fingent.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. fingent.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. fingent.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. fingent.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

fingent.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

3 to fix92
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.8 s

    41 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    900 ms · 204 KiB

    About 204 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2,120 HTML elements

    The page has 2,120 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 76 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    23 KiB

    About 23 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 92

    92/100

    Your mobile performance score is 92. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 108 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 31 ms

    31 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 31 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 235 ms

    235 ms

    Real visitors wait 235 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 148 ms to 160 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 37% faster for real visitors

    -37%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.5 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.4 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Fingent is an award-winning, ISO 27001–certified custom sof…”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 13 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.22 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.22 g of CO₂e: 26.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 804 KiB in 60 requests

    804 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 804 KiB in 60 requests on a phone: stylesheets 306 KiB (41), fonts 244 KiB (4) and other files 103 KiB (5). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8591
  • 15 text elements with low contrast

    15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 8 images without alt text

    8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (89 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 89 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 7 form fields without a label

    7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8388
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“INNOVATION BEYOND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION” and “INNOVATION BEYOND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (257 characters)

    Your meta description is 257 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 192 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 192 pages on fingent.com and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Digital Transformation Services & Solutions | Fingent US”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.fingent.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: AggregateRating, BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.fingent.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Parts of the site are closed to 3 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

3 checks passed
  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,878 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (8 KiB, 94 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 80 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    13 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (fingent.com).

  • Valid certificate (44 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for fingent.com and is valid for another 44 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://fingent.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 47 links work

    All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    fingent.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    fingent.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 23 years old

    23 years

    fingent.com was registered in Feb 2003 through OnlineNIC, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Feb 2030

    fingent.com is registered until Feb 2030.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • A 9-field form

    Your longest form asks for 9 fields (3 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,008 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,008 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Talk to Our AI Engineering Team” and “Contact Us”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 78 customer or partner logos and a star rating.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be fingent.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org include:amazonses.com include:zcsend.in ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It loads jQuery 3.4.1, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 25 issues on fingent.com, including 11 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25