Website review, no card needed

foleys.com.mx logo

foleys.com.mx website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202635 issues · 81 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on foleys.com.mx, 9 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.7 s3.1 sMay 23Nov 73.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20264.5 s
May 30, 20264.4 s
Jun 6, 20264.4 s
Jun 13, 20264.3 s
Jun 20, 20264.1 s
Jun 27, 20264.0 s
Jul 4, 20264.0 s
Jul 11, 20264.0 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20264.0 s
Aug 1, 20264.2 s
Aug 8, 20264.2 s
Aug 15, 20264.4 s
Aug 22, 20264.5 s
Aug 29, 20264.4 s
Sep 5, 20264.4 s
Sep 12, 20264.3 s
Sep 19, 20264.3 s
Sep 26, 20264.2 s
Oct 3, 20264.2 s
Oct 10, 20264.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.7 s
Oct 24, 20263.5 s
Oct 31, 20263.3 s
Nov 7, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
419 ms200 msMay 23Nov 7272 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026225 ms
May 30, 2026227 ms
Jun 6, 2026229 ms
Jun 13, 2026232 ms
Jun 20, 2026225 ms
Jun 27, 2026229 ms
Jul 4, 2026253 ms
Jul 11, 2026271 ms
Jul 18, 2026335 ms
Jul 25, 2026364 ms
Aug 1, 2026378 ms
Aug 8, 2026394 ms
Aug 15, 2026369 ms
Aug 22, 2026370 ms
Aug 29, 2026355 ms
Sep 5, 2026343 ms
Sep 12, 2026339 ms
Sep 19, 2026302 ms
Sep 26, 2026285 ms
Oct 3, 2026275 ms
Oct 10, 2026260 ms
Oct 17, 2026262 ms
Oct 24, 2026267 ms
Oct 31, 2026265 ms
Nov 7, 2026272 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of foleys.com.mx (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. foleys.com.mx at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. foleys.com.mx at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. foleys.com.mx at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. foleys.com.mx at 3.4 s3.4 s
  5. foleys.com.mx at 4.2 s4.2 s
  6. foleys.com.mx at 5.1 s5.1 s
  7. foleys.com.mx at 5.9 s5.9 s
  8. foleys.com.mx at 6.8 s6.8 s

Speed

9 to fix58
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.0 s · 991 KiB

    About 991 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.3 MB

    21 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and TikTok and others), adding 1.8 MB and 829 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    650 ms · 122 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (122 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    600 ms

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 391 ms

    391 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 391 ms of main-thread work and 802 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Shopify adds 75 ms

    75 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 75 ms of main-thread work and 468 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 28 KiB

    About 28 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.7 s

    22.7 s

    Your largest element takes 22.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.1 s

    23.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 233 ms

    233 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 233 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 225 ms to 272 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 177 ms

    177 ms

    Real visitors wait 177 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 615 ms

    615 ms

    Real visitors wait 615 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 26% faster for real visitors

    -26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.5 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 5.6 MB in 342 requests

    5.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 342 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (96), images 2.0 MB (32) and other files 1.1 MB (189). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    WEB_LA_2-3.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (98 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.58 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.58 g of CO₂e: 189.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9194
  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (19 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 19 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 14 links without text

    14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 36 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10085
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“.logo_image { max-height: unset!important; width:…” and “.logo_image { max-height: unset!important; width:…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (182 characters)

    Your meta description is 182 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 100 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 100 pages on foleys.com.mx and 13 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 52 characters

    Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Foley’s | Estilo Mexicano en Moda Femenina – Foley's”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://foleys.com.mx/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://foleys.com.mx/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://foleys.com.mx/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (326 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://foleys.com.mx/collections/all has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://foleys.com.mx/collections/all has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    1 page of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 23 small tap targets

    23 of 76 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 275 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 275 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 16 cookies set on arrival

    16

    Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 27 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at foleys.com.mx, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 16 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Instafeed · Hulk Form Builder · Sami Product Labels · Smart Seo · Essential Announcer · Essential Announcement Bar · Profy Announcement Bar · Forms · Joy Loyalty Program · Countdown Timer · Restockrocket · Order Value Booster · chimpstatic.com · getsitecontrol.com · avada.io · amazonaws.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on foleys.com.mx, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25