Website review, no card needed

foligain.sg logo

foligain.sg website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202634 issues · 81 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on foligain.sg, 6 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: unlabelled dropdowns. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s1.7 sMay 23Nov 71.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Oct 31, 20261.8 s
Nov 7, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
134 ms89 msMay 23Nov 7120 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 202694 ms
May 30, 2026104 ms
Jun 13, 2026111 ms
Jun 20, 2026109 ms
Jul 4, 2026112 ms
Jul 11, 2026111 ms
Jul 18, 2026111 ms
Aug 22, 2026129 ms
Aug 29, 2026128 ms
Sep 5, 2026128 ms
Sep 12, 2026118 ms
Sep 19, 2026116 ms
Sep 26, 2026113 ms
Oct 3, 2026120 ms
Oct 10, 2026121 ms
Oct 17, 2026121 ms
Oct 24, 2026129 ms
Oct 31, 2026120 ms
Nov 7, 2026120 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of foligain.sg (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. foligain.sg at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. foligain.sg at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. foligain.sg at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. foligain.sg at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. foligain.sg at 3.5 s3.5 s
  6. foligain.sg at 4.2 s4.2 s
  7. foligain.sg at 4.9 s4.9 s
  8. foligain.sg at 5.6 s5.6 s

Speed

9 to fix66
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 583 KiB

    About 583 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 66

    66/100

    Your mobile performance score is 66. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and Bing Ads and others), adding 1.2 MB and 559 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 441 ms

    441 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 441 ms of main-thread work and 635 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    420 ms · 65 KiB

    About 65 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 420 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    400 ms

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 400 ms.

  • Main-thread work: 2.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 986 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,618 HTML elements

    The page has 2,618 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Shopify adds 109 ms

    109 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 109 ms of main-thread work and 541 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 210 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 8 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    50 ms · 9 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 12 ms

    12 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.9 s

    8.9 s

    Your largest element takes 8.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 13.0 s

    13.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 21% slower for real visitors

    +21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 120 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 243 ms

    243 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 243 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 118 ms

    118 ms

    Real visitors wait 118 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 565 ms

    565 ms

    Real visitors wait 565 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 3.2 MB in 253 requests

    3.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 253 requests on a phone: scripts 1.2 MB (108), other files 868 KiB (87) and images 848 KiB (29). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    BUY-FOLIGAIN-MINOXIDIL_ONLINE_SINGAPORE_540x.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.91 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.91 g of CO₂e: 109.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8491
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 10 text elements with low contrast

    10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (4 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (73 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 73 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 71 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9282
  • Title is long (80 characters)

    Your title is 80 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “FOLIGAIN® Singapore | Minoxidil & TRIOXIDIL® for Hair Loss – FOLIGAIN® SINGAPORE”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “TRUSTED. LOVED. PROVEN”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 190 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 190 pages on foligain.sg and 12 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 148 characters

    Your meta description is 148 characters: “FOLIGAIN® Singapore with Minoxidil & TRIOXIDIL®. Helps support hair growth and reduce hair loss for thicker, fuller-loo…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://foligain.sg/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://foligain.sg/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,269 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://foligain.sg/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://foligain.sg/products/foligain%C2%AE-2ddr-hair-regeneration-serum, whose canonical is https://foligain.sg/products/foligain%c2%ae-2ddr-hair-regeneration-serum. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 56 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://reorder-master.hulkapps.com/css/re-order.css?v=2025-12-04%2003:54:41' from origin …”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,113 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,113 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 21 calls to action

    The homepage has 21 calls to action, for example “SHOP”, “Contact Us” and “SHOP ULTRA-PURE MINOXIDIL™”.

  • 5 short forms

    5 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 20 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads and Reddit Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 22 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at foligain.sg, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 7 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Pandectes Gdpr · Judge Me Reviews · Elevar Conversion Tracking · T Lab Ai Translate · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Moast · trustpilot.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on foligain.sg, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25