Website review, no card needed

fourth.com logo

fourth.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202632 issues · 98 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on fourth.com, 6 of them high impact, across 98 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s1.2 sMay 9Oct 241.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.5 s
Oct 24, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s696 msMay 9Oct 241.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.1 s
Sep 5, 20261.1 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 20261.0 s
Oct 3, 20261.0 s
Oct 10, 20261.0 s
Oct 17, 20261.0 s
Oct 24, 20261.1 s

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of fourth.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. fourth.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. fourth.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. fourth.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. fourth.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. fourth.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. fourth.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. fourth.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. fourth.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

fourth.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

7 to fix71
  • 3,684 HTML elements

    The page has 3,684 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 71

    71/100

    Your mobile performance score is 71. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Convert Insights and others), adding 1.7 MB and 753 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 743 KiB

    About 743 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 317 ms

    317 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 317 ms of main-thread work and 555 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 263 ms

    263 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 263 ms of main-thread work and 742 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 94 KiB

    About 94 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 92 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (92 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 40 KiB

    4 images could be 40 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 108 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 74 ms

    74 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 74 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.1 s

    15.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Your largest element takes 5.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “HotSchedules. For the people who make the shift work. Smart…”.

  • Real-user TTFB: 977 ms

    977 ms

    Real visitors wait 977 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 245 ms

    245 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 245 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 52% faster for real visitors

    -52%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 2.2 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 48% faster for real visitors

    -48%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.054

    0.054

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.054, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

2 to fix78
  • Page weight: 3.0 MB in 90 requests

    3.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.0 MB in 90 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (28), images 747 KiB (40) and other files 355 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (347 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.86 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.86 g of CO₂e: 102.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8793
  • 29 text elements with low contrast

    29 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (68 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 68 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 15 links without text

    15 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 41 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9294
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 2 is not valid JSON (Unexpected token '/', ..."ph": [ // CORPORA"... is not va)”.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 133 internal links, 29 external

    The homepage links to 133 pages on fourth.com and 29 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 111 characters

    Your meta description is 111 characters: “Restaurant and hospitality-specific technology, services, and analytics to manage your workforce and inventory.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “HotSchedules. For the people who make the shift work.”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Fourth — Workforce Management & Inventory Software”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.fourth.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.fourth.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,812 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 pages share a title

    /solution/ai and /solution/ai-intro all use the title “Introducing Fourth iQ | Fourth”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    /solution/fourth-iq-app, /solution/above-store-strategy and /solution/ai-getting-started have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /solution/ai and /solution/ai-intro use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /solution/ai-intro, whose canonical is /solution/ai. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 61 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    24 of 28 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix89
  • http:// does not redirect

    http://fourth.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://fourth.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (fourth.com).

  • Valid certificate (34 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for fourth.com and is valid for another 34 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 52 links work

    All 52 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 12 external) answered without errors.

  • security.txt published

    A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    fourth.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    fourth.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 29 years old

    29 years

    fourth.com was registered in Oct 1997 through Amazon Registrar, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Oct 2027

    fourth.com is registered until Oct 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • A 20-field form

    Your longest form asks for 20 fields (11 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,395 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,395 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact” and “Get a Demo”.

  • 18 calls to action

    The homepage has 18 calls to action, for example “Get a Demo”, “Schedule Scoring” and “Red Book Solutions”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 5 testimonial or review blocks and 26 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:13.111.2.116 include:_spf.salesforce.com include:eu._netblocks.mimecast.com include:mktomail.com include:mai…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on fourth.com, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25