Website review, no card needed

functionofbeauty.com logo

functionofbeauty.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202641 issues · 106 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on functionofbeauty.com, 12 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s2.0 sMay 16Oct 312.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.0 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Oct 31, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
265 ms158 msMay 16Oct 31170 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026221 ms
May 23, 2026224 ms
May 30, 2026229 ms
Jun 6, 2026234 ms
Jun 13, 2026245 ms
Jun 20, 2026242 ms
Jun 27, 2026246 ms
Jul 4, 2026253 ms
Jul 11, 2026238 ms
Jul 18, 2026226 ms
Jul 25, 2026205 ms
Aug 1, 2026195 ms
Aug 8, 2026196 ms
Aug 15, 2026196 ms
Aug 22, 2026197 ms
Aug 29, 2026196 ms
Sep 5, 2026194 ms
Sep 12, 2026189 ms
Sep 19, 2026185 ms
Sep 26, 2026177 ms
Oct 3, 2026175 ms
Oct 10, 2026172 ms
Oct 17, 2026177 ms
Oct 24, 2026177 ms
Oct 31, 2026170 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of functionofbeauty.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. functionofbeauty.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. functionofbeauty.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. functionofbeauty.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. functionofbeauty.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  5. functionofbeauty.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. functionofbeauty.com at 5.5 s5.5 s
  7. functionofbeauty.com at 6.4 s6.4 s
  8. functionofbeauty.com at 7.3 s7.3 s

functionofbeauty.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

12 to fix27
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 27

    27/100

    Your mobile performance score is 27. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo and others), adding 4.3 MB and 2.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 1.3 MB

    About 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    250 ms · 837 KiB

    27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (837 KiB).

  • Shopify adds 622 ms

    622 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 622 ms of main-thread work and 2.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 548 ms

    548 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 548 ms of main-thread work and 546 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Klaviyo adds 292 ms

    292 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 292 ms of main-thread work and 512 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 332 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    298 KiB

    7 images could be 298 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Osano CMP adds 273 ms

    273 ms

    Osano CMP costs a phone 273 ms of main-thread work and 75 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    260 ms · 90 KiB

    About 90 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 260 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    200 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    74 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 74 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 16 ms

    16 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 29.3 s

    29.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 29.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.8 s

    12.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Your largest element takes 6.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.16

    0.16

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.16 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.248

    0.248

    The layout shifts by 0.248 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 169 ms

    169 ms

    Real visitors wait 169 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 601 ms

    601 ms

    Real visitors wait 601 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 22% faster for real visitors

    -22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 221 ms to 170 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 31% faster for real visitors

    -31%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 7.7 MB in 399 requests

    7.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.7 MB in 399 requests on a phone: scripts 3.0 MB (115), media 2.0 MB (1) and other files 1.2 MB (209). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.19 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.19 g of CO₂e: 262.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 10091
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (1 element)

    [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (4 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10086
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Your cart” and “Function of Beauty”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (239 characters)

    Your meta description is 239 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 31 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 31 pages on functionofbeauty.com and 15 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Hair Care Customized by Hair Type | Function of Beauty”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://functionofbeauty.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://functionofbeauty.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (749 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 5 pages share a meta description

    /pages/shop-all, /pages/shop-by-hair-type, /pages/code-of-conduct, /blogs/blog and /pages/reviews use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    /pages/hair-quiz, /pages/shop-all, /pages/store-locator, /pages/about, /pages/shop-all-custom-sets-and-routines and /pages/shop-by-hair-type and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    /pages/shop-all-custom-sets-and-routines took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 18 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 12 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “catched”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://functionofbeauty.faire.com/ (404).

  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 91 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (functionofbeauty.com).

  • Valid certificate (68 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for functionofbeauty.com and is valid for another 68 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://functionofbeauty.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    functionofbeauty.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    functionofbeauty.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 11 years old

    11 years

    functionofbeauty.com was registered in Jan 2015 through Amazon Registrar, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Jan 2031

    functionofbeauty.com is registered until Jan 2031.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 14 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 528 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 528 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP YOUR HAIR TYPE”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Shop Your Hair Type” and “Shop Now”.

  • 6 short forms

    6 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Hotjar.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Email authentication

2 to fix60
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be functionofbeauty.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • SPF does not block other senders (no all)

    Your SPF record doesn't end in -all or ~all, so it doesn't stop other servers sending as you: “v=spf1 ip4:52.35.242.183 include:_spf.google.com”.

  • Email authentication score: 60/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Klaviyo and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 26 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 14 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

None of the apps your storefront loads is on the list of apps with a known security problem.

Apps your storefront loads

Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Wingify · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Microsoft Clarity · Yotpo Product Reviews · Attentive · Genesis · Freegifts · rechargecdn.com · csell.co · attn.tv · pepperjam.com · bogos.io · bazaarvoice.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Hotjar | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Hiring

Hiring
1 open role
Teams
Indirect Labor (1)
Job board
rippling

Company

Employees
98
Headquarters
New York

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on functionofbeauty.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25