Website review, no card needed

fuxtec-spain.es logo

fuxtec-spain.es website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202648 issues · 87 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on fuxtec-spain.es, 21 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.0 s4.2 sMay 23Nov 74.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20264.6 s
May 30, 20264.5 s
Jun 6, 20264.5 s
Jun 13, 20264.4 s
Jun 20, 20264.4 s
Jun 27, 20264.5 s
Jul 4, 20264.6 s
Jul 11, 20264.7 s
Jul 18, 20264.8 s
Jul 25, 20264.9 s
Aug 1, 20264.8 s
Aug 8, 20264.9 s
Aug 15, 20264.9 s
Aug 22, 20264.9 s
Aug 29, 20264.8 s
Sep 5, 20264.8 s
Sep 12, 20264.7 s
Sep 19, 20264.7 s
Sep 26, 20264.6 s
Oct 3, 20264.6 s
Oct 10, 20264.4 s
Oct 17, 20264.3 s
Oct 24, 20264.3 s
Oct 31, 20264.4 s
Nov 7, 20264.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
191 ms157 msMay 23Nov 7173 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026186 ms
May 30, 2026187 ms
Jun 6, 2026182 ms
Jun 13, 2026178 ms
Jun 20, 2026178 ms
Jun 27, 2026175 ms
Jul 4, 2026179 ms
Jul 11, 2026183 ms
Jul 18, 2026184 ms
Jul 25, 2026185 ms
Aug 1, 2026182 ms
Aug 8, 2026178 ms
Aug 15, 2026175 ms
Aug 22, 2026169 ms
Aug 29, 2026163 ms
Sep 5, 2026162 ms
Sep 12, 2026161 ms
Sep 19, 2026169 ms
Sep 26, 2026175 ms
Oct 3, 2026179 ms
Oct 10, 2026178 ms
Oct 17, 2026173 ms
Oct 24, 2026172 ms
Oct 31, 2026172 ms
Nov 7, 2026173 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of fuxtec-spain.es (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. fuxtec-spain.es at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. fuxtec-spain.es at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. fuxtec-spain.es at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. fuxtec-spain.es at 3.7 s3.7 s
  5. fuxtec-spain.es at 4.7 s4.7 s
  6. fuxtec-spain.es at 5.6 s5.6 s
  7. fuxtec-spain.es at 6.5 s6.5 s
  8. fuxtec-spain.es at 7.5 s7.5 s

Speed

14 to fix34
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.8 s · 767 KiB

    About 767 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 11.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 11.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, ccm19.de and aov.ai and others), adding 3.8 MB and 1.9 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 178 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (178 KiB).

  • Shopify adds 784 ms

    784 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 784 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • ccm19.de adds 570 ms

    570 ms

    ccm19.de costs a phone 570 ms of main-thread work and 123 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    50 ms · 395 KiB

    6 images could be 395 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 58 KiB

    About 58 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    300 ms · 28 KiB

    28 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2,855 HTML elements

    The page has 2,855 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • apphero.co adds 12 ms

    12 ms

    apphero.co costs a phone 12 ms of main-thread work and 2.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 182 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 21 ms

    21 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Real visitors wait 5.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 5.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 32.5 s

    32.5 s

    Your largest element takes 32.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 34.8 s

    34.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 34.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.8 s

    14.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 968 ms

    968 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 968 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.16

    0.16

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.16 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 963 ms

    963 ms

    Real visitors wait 963 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.101

    0.101

    The layout shifts by 0.101 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 186 ms to 173 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.6 s to 4.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 185 ms

    185 ms

    Real visitors wait 185 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 7.1 MB in 302 requests

    7.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.1 MB in 302 requests on a phone: other files 3.3 MB (147), scripts 1.8 MB (105) and images 1.5 MB (33). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Website_Banner_Mobile_Pre_Blacksale_Canva.psd.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (228 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.01 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.01 g of CO₂e: 240.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8791
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 64 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 53 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10081
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is long (178 characters)

    Your meta description is 178 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url points at a different host (https://fuxtec.de)”.

  • 72 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 72 pages on fuxtec-spain.es and 0 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Herramientas de jardín FUXTEC - ¡Potencia para tu jardín!”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://fuxtec-spain.es/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://fuxtec-spain.es/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix75
  • Some text only appears after JavaScript runs

    58%

    The HTML your server sends has 256 of the 438 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.

  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://fuxtec-spain.es/llms.txt (195 KiB, 367 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://fuxtec-spain.es/collections/casa-y-jardin, https://fuxtec-spain.es/collections/cortacespedes, https://fuxtec-spain.es/collections/tractores-cortacesped, https://fuxtec-spain.es/collections/robots-cortacesped, https://fuxtec-spain.es/collections/desbrozadoras and https://fuxtec-spain.es/collections/cortasetos and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://fuxtec-spain.es/collections/trituradoras-de-jardin and https://fuxtec-spain.es/collections/barredoras took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 70 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 12 small tap targets

    12 of 28 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “GrTracking is not defined”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 438 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 438 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 27 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at fuxtec-spain.es, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 18 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Microsoft Clarity · Boost Ai Search Filter · Fast Bundle Upsell · Attributepro · Autocart · Bloop Refer Aff · Ta Banner Pop Up · Hulk Contact Form Builder · Getresponse · Ta Labels Badges · Bloop Referral Loyalty · Checkout Sales Buddy · Restockrocket · Accessez · cloudfront.net · jsdelivr.net · wetracked.io · thegoodapi.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on fuxtec-spain.es, including 26 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25