Website review, no card needed
fuxtec.it website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202642 issues · 86 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on fuxtec.it, 18 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67D- #98,336 of 109,350 reviewed websitesbeats 8%
- #58,494 of 61,859 online storesbeats 4%
- #53,833 of 56,401 Shopify storesbeats 4%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 5.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 187 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 187 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 215 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.9 s · 732 KiBAbout 732 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.6 s · 325 KiB17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (325 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, aov.ai and fastbundle.co and others), adding 1.6 MB and 740 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
50 ms · 397 KiB6 images could be 397 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
400 ms9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 400 ms.
Main-thread work: 3.9 s
A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Shopify adds 314 ms
314 msShopify costs a phone 314 ms of main-thread work and 665 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 74 KiBAbout 74 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
2,655 HTML elements
The page has 2,655 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 139 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Duplicated JavaScript
100 ms · 28 KiB28 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 22 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 31 ms
31 msYour server sent the HTML in 31 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.0 s
5.0 sReal visitors wait 5.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 5.1 s
5.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 5.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 29.3 s
29.3 sYour largest element takes 29.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 31.1 s
31.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.7 s
8.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s
3.2 sThe first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 201 ms
201 msReal visitors wait 201 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 969 ms
969 msReal visitors wait 969 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 187 ms to 215 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.0 s to 5.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 194 ms
194 msScripts block the page for only 194 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.8 MB in 252 requests
5.8 MBYour homepage downloads 5.8 MB in 252 requests on a phone: other files 2.2 MB (94), scripts 1.7 MB (109) and images 1.5 MB (33). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Fuxlife_Launch_Banner_1300x1600P0x_NEU_IT.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image in older formats
1 image (228 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.64 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.64 g of CO₂e: 197.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 65 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
53 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (66 characters)
Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Attrezzi da giardino FUXTEC - Qualità tedesca per il tuo giardino!”.
Meta description is short (68 characters)
Your meta description is only 68 characters: “FUXTEC - Il professionista del giardino per tutte le tue necessità!.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url points at a different host (https://fuxtec.de)”.
97 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 97 pages on fuxtec.it and 0 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://fuxtec.it/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://fuxtec.it/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (332 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://fuxtec.it/llms.txt (195 KiB, 367 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 pages without an H1
https://fuxtec.it/collections/casa-e-giardino, https://fuxtec.it/products/tagliaerba-benzina-fx-rm5170, https://fuxtec.it/collections/tagliaerba, https://fuxtec.it/collections/trattorini-tagliaerba, https://fuxtec.it/collections/robot-tagliaerba and https://fuxtec.it/collections/decespugliatori and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://fuxtec.it/collections/soffiatori, https://fuxtec.it/collections/trituratori-da-giardino and https://fuxtec.it/collections/spazzatrici took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 93 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
11 small tap targets
11 of 27 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “GrTracking is not defined”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 464 words of copy
The homepage carries about 464 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
24 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at fuxtec.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 13 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Attributepro · Judge Me Reviews · Boost Ai Search Filter · Ta Labels Badges · Bloop Refer Aff · Bloop Referral Loyalty · Accessez · Aov Bundle Upsell · Restockrocket · cloudfront.net · jsdelivr.net · wetracked.io · thegoodapi.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on fuxtec.it, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.