Website review, no card needed

gacancer.com logo

gacancer.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202639 issues · 108 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on gacancer.com, 11 of them high impact, across 108 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.7 sMay 9Oct 243.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
68 ms62 msMay 9Oct 2466 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202666 ms
May 16, 202667 ms
May 23, 202666 ms
May 30, 202666 ms
Jun 6, 202667 ms
Jun 13, 202665 ms
Jun 20, 202664 ms
Jun 27, 202663 ms
Jul 4, 202663 ms
Jul 11, 202666 ms
Jul 18, 202667 ms
Jul 25, 202663 ms
Aug 1, 202663 ms
Aug 8, 202663 ms
Aug 15, 202663 ms
Aug 22, 202666 ms
Aug 29, 202667 ms
Sep 5, 202665 ms
Sep 12, 202663 ms
Sep 19, 202664 ms
Sep 26, 202663 ms
Oct 3, 202666 ms
Oct 10, 202667 ms
Oct 17, 202666 ms
Oct 24, 202666 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

7 to fix62
  • Improve image delivery

    1.6 s · 648 KiB

    8 images could be 648 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    660 ms · 70 KiB

    About 70 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 660 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    500 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 500 ms).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    330 ms · 22 KiB

    About 22 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 330 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    330 ms · 7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Cloudflare CDN and Google Fonts), adding 139 KiB and 3 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    9 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 134 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 55 ms

    55 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 55 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    Your largest element takes 7.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “GEORGIA CANCER SPECIALISTS Administrative Annex”. Most of its time is resource load delay (4.3 s).

  • Speed Index: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.0 s

    8.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 11 images without width and height

    11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 66 ms to 66 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 54 ms

    54 ms

    Real visitors wait 54 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.1

    0.1

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.1, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix79
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    slide1.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (784 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    258 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example NHCI-logo-revised-010824a.jpg at 2,052 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 258 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (146 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.37 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.37 g of CO₂e: 44.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.3 MB in 57 requests

    1.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 57 requests on a phone: images 921 KiB (29), stylesheets 141 KiB (13) and fonts 139 KiB (6). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7286
  • Input buttons must have discernible text (1 element)

    Input buttons must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 5 images without alt text

    5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (29 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 29 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9297
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 101 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 101 pages on gacancer.com and 7 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “Georgia Cancer Specialists located in Atlanta, GA is a national leader in advanced cancer treatment and research provid…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Welcome To Georgia Cancer Specialists”.

  • Title: 47 characters

    Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Georgia Cancer Specialists | Atlanta, GA | Home”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.gacancer.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.gacancer.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (474 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 41 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 8885
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Bootstrap's JavaScript requires jQuery version 1.9.1 or higher, but lower than version 3”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 6 low-resolution images

    6 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix83
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HTTP/1.1 only

    The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://carespaceportal.com/.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (gacancer.com).

  • Valid certificate (43 days left)

    The certificate from Sectigo Limited · Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36 verifies for gacancer.com and is valid for another 43 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://gacancer.com redirects to the secure version.

  • All 46 links work

    All 46 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 6 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    gacancer.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    gacancer.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 29 years old

    29 years

    gacancer.com was registered in Mar 1997 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Mar 2033

    gacancer.com is registered until Mar 2033.

Content and conversion

2 to fix88
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 260 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 260 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Contact”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Join Our Team” and “Contact Research”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 1 trust badge.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Email authentication

2 to fix60
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be gacancer.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 60/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:%{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com ~all”.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It loads jQuery 3.0.0, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Hosting
Inmotion

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on gacancer.com, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25