Website review, no card needed
gacl.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202643 issues · 109 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on gacl.com, 21 of them high impact, across 109 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 148 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 139 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
2.0 s
3.0 s
4.0 s
5.0 s
6.0 s
7.0 s
8.0 s
gacl.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.4 s66 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.4 s.
Document request latency
2.3 sThe HTML itself could arrive about 2.3 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Avoid multiple page redirects
1.1 sThe page goes through 2 redirects before it starts loading, costing about 1.1 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.2 s
A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused JavaScript
780 ms · 250 KiBAbout 250 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 780 ms faster on a phone.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Cloudflare CDN, Google Tag Manager and Google Fonts and others), adding 479 KiB and 706 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
580 ms · 154 KiBAbout 154 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 580 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
500 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 500 ms).
Cloudflare CDN adds 446 ms
446 msCloudflare CDN costs a phone 446 ms of main-thread work and 88 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 260 ms
260 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 260 ms of main-thread work and 308 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,665 HTML elements
The page has 1,665 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 184 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
47 KiB4 images could be 47 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Minify CSS
10 ms · 25 KiB25 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
5 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 5 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
1 checks passed
Server response: 69 ms
69 msYour server sent the HTML in 69 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.1 s
5.1 sReal visitors wait 5.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.6 s
9.6 sYour largest element takes 9.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (5.9 s).
Speed Index: 13.6 s
13.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.0 s
5.0 sThe first text or image appears after 5.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 13.1 s
13.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 13.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 392 ms
392 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 392 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 139 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 146 ms
146 msReal visitors wait 146 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.0 MB in 104 requests
2.0 MBYour homepage downloads 2.0 MB in 104 requests on a phone: scripts 828 KiB (38), images 701 KiB (17) and fonts 262 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (22 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.58 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.58 g of CO₂e: 69.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
24 text elements with low contrast
24 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
6 links with vague text
6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
123 internal links, 28 external
The homepage links to 123 pages on gacl.com and 28 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 45 characters
Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “Home - Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Limited”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://gacl.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://gacl.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,538 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
/the-corporate-world, /corporate-philosophy, /governing-body, /our-journey, /honours-recognitions and /caustic-soda-group and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
/the-corporate-world, /corporate-philosophy, /governing-body, /our-journey, /honours-recognitions and /caustic-soda-group and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
12 pages slow to respond
/corporate-philosophy, /our-journey, /honours-recognitions, /caustic-soda-group, /caustic-potash-group and /chlorotoluene-group and 6 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 90 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (gacl.com).
Valid certificate (43 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for gacl.com and is valid for another 43 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://gacl.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 60 links work
All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors; 2 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
gacl.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
gacl.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 24 years old
24 yearsgacl.com was registered in Nov 2001 through eNom, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Nov 2029
gacl.com is registered until Nov 2029.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,662 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,662 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Join Now” and “Register Now”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 34 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
No DMARC policy
gacl.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 35/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
1 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all”.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.3
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Hostinger
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on gacl.com, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.