Website review, no card needed

getcoconut.com logo

getcoconut.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202635 issues · 86 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on getcoconut.com, 12 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s1.9 sMay 2Oct 172.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.2 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
248 ms170 msMay 2Oct 17230 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026195 ms
May 9, 2026203 ms
May 16, 2026222 ms
May 23, 2026238 ms
May 30, 2026239 ms
Jun 6, 2026217 ms
Jun 13, 2026212 ms
Jun 20, 2026212 ms
Jun 27, 2026213 ms
Jul 4, 2026215 ms
Jul 11, 2026204 ms
Jul 18, 2026201 ms
Jul 25, 2026186 ms
Aug 1, 2026179 ms
Aug 8, 2026182 ms
Aug 15, 2026182 ms
Aug 22, 2026187 ms
Aug 29, 2026185 ms
Sep 5, 2026183 ms
Sep 12, 2026186 ms
Sep 19, 2026197 ms
Sep 26, 2026215 ms
Oct 3, 2026226 ms
Oct 10, 2026225 ms
Oct 17, 2026230 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of getcoconut.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. getcoconut.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. getcoconut.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. getcoconut.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  4. getcoconut.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  5. getcoconut.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  6. getcoconut.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  7. getcoconut.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  8. getcoconut.com at 5.3 s5.3 s

Speed

9 to fix35
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.7 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.7 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 573 KiB

    About 573 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 539 KiB

    36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (539 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 35

    35/100

    Your mobile performance score is 35 (desktop: 69). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Intercom and website-files.com and others), adding 1.9 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 78 KiB

    About 78 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 481 ms

    481 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 481 ms of main-thread work and 527 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • website-files.com adds 237 ms

    237 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 237 ms of main-thread work and 721 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 202 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    87 KiB

    7 images could be 87 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 69 but mobile only 35. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

14 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.28

    0.28

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.28 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.6 s

    10.6 s

    Your largest element takes 10.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Tax is changing. Stay ahead with Coconut.”.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.5 s

    18.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 204 ms

    204 ms

    Real visitors wait 204 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 37% slower for real visitors

    +37%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.247

    0.247

    The layout shifts by 0.247 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 586 ms

    586 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 586 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 29 images without width and height

    29 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 195 ms to 230 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 114 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 114 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (46), images 506 KiB (24) and fonts 187 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.71 g of CO₂e: 85.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8590
  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (63 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 63 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 14 links without text

    14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (5 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 111 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9294
  • 21 links with vague text

    21 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and SoftwareApplication) but with 1 problem, for example “SoftwareApplication: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.

  • 90 internal links, 41 external

    The homepage links to 90 pages on getcoconut.com and 41 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 141 characters

    Your meta description is 141 characters: “Discover how Coconut helps you with self employed accounting software, perfect for freelancers and sole traders looking…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Tax is changing.Stay ahead with Coconut.”.

  • Title: 43 characters

    Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Self employed accounting software | Coconut”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.getcoconut.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.getcoconut.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,935 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.getcoconut.com/llms.txt (2 KiB, 9 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 38 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    9 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix88
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,723 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,723 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start your 14-day free trial” and “Sign up >”.

  • 15 calls to action

    The homepage has 15 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Sign up today!” and “Start your 14-day free trial”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (7 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 5 testimonial or review blocks, 26 customer or partner logos and 23 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 26 cookies set on arrival

    26

    Opening the homepage sets 26 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 29 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at getcoconut.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Framework
Bootstrap
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on getcoconut.com, including 23 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25