Website review, no card needed
gramedia.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202641 issues · 103 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on gramedia.com, 17 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: gramedia.net adds 2.7 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 388 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 388 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 389 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 390 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 392 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 390 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 390 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 393 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 397 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 410 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 414 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 416 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 417 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 418 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 424 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 429 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 435 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 441 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 448 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 453 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 456 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 447 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 438 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 422 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 408 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
gramedia.net adds 2.7 s
2.7 sgramedia.net costs a phone 2.7 s of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.2 s · 688 KiBAbout 688 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 588 KiB22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (588 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s
1.2 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 745 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 10.6 s
A phone's processor spends 10.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 11
11/100Your mobile performance score is 11. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (gramedia.net, Google Tag Manager and webtrafficsource.com and others), adding 3.0 MB and 5.9 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
850 ms · 328 KiB16 images could be 328 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 850 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.0 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
webtrafficsource.com adds 609 ms
609 mswebtrafficsource.com costs a phone 609 ms of main-thread work and 8 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Insider adds 396 ms
396 msInsider costs a phone 396 ms of main-thread work and 502 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 393 ms
393 msFacebook costs a phone 393 ms of main-thread work and 281 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
400 ms5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 400 ms.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 14 KiBAbout 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 35 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Duplicated JavaScript
20 KiB20 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 89 ms
89 msYour server sent the HTML in 89 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 589 ms
589 msReal visitors wait 589 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.48
0.48For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.48 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.2 s
16.2 sYour largest element takes 16.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “…”.
Total Blocking Time: 4.1 s
4.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 4.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 24.0 s
24.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.9 s
11.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.761
0.761The layout shifts by 0.761 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 856 ms
856 msReal visitors wait 856 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 388 ms to 408 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.4 MB in 239 requests
3.4 MBYour homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 239 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (105), images 989 KiB (41) and other files 143 KiB (81). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
107 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example e-meterai-banner.fe1ccdbd.avif at 2,536 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 107 KiB.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
0.95 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.95 g of CO₂e: 114.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
107 text elements with low contrast
107 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links must have discernible text (5 elements)
Links must have discernible text: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (4 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 57 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
61 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 61 pages on gramedia.com and 11 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 127 characters
Your meta description is 127 characters: “Toko Buku Online Gramedia menyediakan aneka buku berkualitas dan terlengkap. Nikmati promo buku murah dengan pengiriman…”.
Title: 40 characters
Your title is a healthy 40 characters: “Toko Buku Online Terbesar | Gramedia.com”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.gramedia.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebPage.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.gramedia.com/static/sitemaps/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (474 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (1 KiB, 5 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
6 pages share a title
/categories/fashion-aksesoris/tas, /categories/buku, /categories/olahraga, /categories/stationery-sekolah-kantor, /categories/mainan-hobi and /categories/teknologi all use the title “Jual terbaru dan best seller Oktober 2026 - Gramedia.com”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
14 pages share a meta description
/promo, /store, /contact, /promo/event-world-wise, /promo/pantone-available-now-at-gramediacom and /promo/promo-bundling-ebook and 2 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
11 pages without an H1
/promo/event-world-wise, /promo/pantone-available-now-at-gramediacom, /promo/promo-bundling-ebook, /categories/fashion-aksesoris/tas, /categories/buku and /categories/olahraga and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
14 pages with very little text
/promo, /store, /contact, /promo/event-world-wise, /promo/pantone-available-now-at-gramediacom and /promo/promo-bundling-ebook and 8 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 55 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
76 of 81 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (gramedia.com).
Valid certificate (149 days left)
The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for gramedia.com and is valid for another 149 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://gramedia.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 51 links work
All 51 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 11 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
gramedia.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
gramedia.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 28 years old
28 yearsgramedia.com was registered in Jul 1998 through OnlineNIC, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jul 2027
gramedia.com is registered until Jul 2027.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 458 words of copy
The homepage carries about 458 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Gramedia Digital (E-Book)”.
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Gramedia Digital (E-book)”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:202.146.2.63 ip4:202.146.0.164 ip4:202.146.2.164 a:mail.gramedia.com mx include:_spf.google.com include:mai…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “default”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- AWS
Company
- Founded
- 1970
- Headquarters
- Jakarta
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on gramedia.com, including 23 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.