Website review, no card needed

groovebags.com logo

groovebags.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202640 issues · 81 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on groovebags.com, 14 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s1.3 sMay 23Nov 72.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.6 s
Jul 11, 20263.9 s
Jul 18, 20263.4 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.5 s
Aug 15, 20263.6 s
Aug 22, 20263.5 s
Aug 29, 20263.3 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Oct 31, 20262.7 s
Nov 7, 20262.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
681 ms70 msMay 23Nov 7279 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026291 ms
May 30, 2026292 ms
Jun 6, 2026288 ms
Jun 13, 2026284 ms
Jun 20, 2026235 ms
Jun 27, 2026272 ms
Jul 4, 2026396 ms
Jul 11, 2026542 ms
Jul 18, 2026610 ms
Jul 25, 2026512 ms
Aug 1, 2026405 ms
Aug 8, 2026330 ms
Aug 15, 2026313 ms
Aug 22, 2026460 ms
Aug 29, 2026602 ms
Sep 5, 2026527 ms
Sep 12, 2026221 ms
Sep 19, 2026158 ms
Sep 26, 2026145 ms
Oct 3, 2026143 ms
Oct 10, 2026140 ms
Oct 17, 2026156 ms
Oct 24, 2026210 ms
Oct 31, 2026264 ms
Nov 7, 2026279 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of groovebags.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. groovebags.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. groovebags.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. groovebags.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. groovebags.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. groovebags.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  6. groovebags.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  7. groovebags.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  8. groovebags.com at 4.2 s4.2 s

Speed

7 to fix72
  • Improve image delivery

    12.4 s · 2.5 MB

    3 images could be 2.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 12.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 310 KiB

    23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (310 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.0 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.0 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 348 KiB

    About 348 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 72

    72/100

    Your mobile performance score is 72. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 40 KiB

    About 40 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • teepublic.com adds 89 ms

    89 ms

    teepublic.com costs a phone 89 ms of main-thread work and 395 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Other Google APIs/SDKs, teepublic.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 792 KiB and 332 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 65 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 379 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 220 ms

    220 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 220 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.5 s

    17.5 s

    Your largest element takes 17.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Naga Gold Promo”.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.5 s

    17.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 280 ms

    280 ms

    Real visitors wait 280 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 68% slower for real visitors

    +68%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 291 ms to 279 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 722 ms

    722 ms

    Real visitors wait 722 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 25 ms

    25 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 25 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix40
  • 1 image over 500 KB

    jagoledak-com.png weighs 2.4 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    700 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example jagoledak-com.png at 1,254 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 700 KiB.

  • Page weight: 3.4 MB in 40 requests

    3.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 40 requests on a phone: images 2.6 MB (19), scripts 524 KiB (12) and fonts 142 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (2.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.96 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.96 g of CO₂e: 115.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7087
  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Positive tabindex

    1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • 17 images without alt text

    17 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8587
  • Title is long (82 characters)

    Your title is 82 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “JAGOLEDAK 2026 | Situs Game Slot Online Menyediakan Live RTP Tertinggi Setiap Hari”.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.jagoledak.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 140 internal links, 18 external

    The homepage links to 140 pages on groovebags.com and 18 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 118 characters

    Your meta description is 118 characters: “Jagoledak adalah salah satu platfrom slot online yang banyak menyediakan layanan permainan yang bisa menghasikan cuan.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “JAGOLEDAK 2026 | Situs Game Slot Online Menyediakan Live RTP Tertinggi Setiap Hari”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.jagoledak.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, Product, SoftwareApplication and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.jagoledak.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,206 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix0
  • 15 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.jagoledak.com/t-shirts, https://www.jagoledak.com/order/status, https://www.jagoledak.com/contact, https://www.jagoledak.com/shipping, https://www.jagoledak.com/sizechart and https://www.jagoledak.com/about and 9 others, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

Best practices

5 to fixGoogle 6966
  • 7 broken images

    7 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://assets.teepublic.com/assets/teepublicons/x_close_orange400-c1926221e50e7f6686d23ac344405449054e43f23d0f3306f15d8dfd546f999a.svg.

  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 32 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set properties of null (setting 'innerHTML')”.

  • No character set

    No character set is declared, so some characters can render as gibberish.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 580 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 580 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop All Designs”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Shop All Designs”, “Order Status” and “Contact Us”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 50 testimonial or review blocks, 1 customer or partner logo, a star rating and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at groovebags.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify;Shopify Plus
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on groovebags.com, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25