Website review, no card needed
halcones.co website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202642 issues · 104 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on halcones.co, 16 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 131 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 173 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.3 s · 17.6 MB57 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (17.6 MB).
Render-blocking requests
5.8 s16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.8 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.7 s · 838 KiBAbout 838 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.7 s faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and clientify.net and others), adding 2.5 MB and 926 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 51
51/100Your mobile performance score is 51 (desktop: 57). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 503 ms
503 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 503 ms of main-thread work and 705 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
360 ms · 23 KiBAbout 23 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 360 ms faster on a phone.
Facebook adds 264 ms
264 msFacebook costs a phone 264 ms of main-thread work and 335 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.8 s
A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
clientify.net adds 156 ms
156 msclientify.net costs a phone 156 ms of main-thread work and 918 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,011 HTML elements
The page has 2,011 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Google Fonts adds 0 ms
0 msGoogle Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 566 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 165 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
15 KiB1 image could be 15 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 320 ms
320 msYour server sent the HTML in 320 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.9 s
4.9 sReal visitors wait 4.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.5 s
17.5 sYour largest element takes 17.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Con más de 59 años formando pilotos y tripulantes de cabina…”.
Time to Interactive: 20.3 s
20.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.0 s
6.0 sThe first text or image appears after 6.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.2 s
7.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 36% slower for real visitors
+36%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 123 ms to 173 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 326 ms
326 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 326 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
7 images without width and height
7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 164 ms
164 msReal visitors wait 164 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 19.5 MB in 104 requests
19.5 MBYour homepage downloads 19.5 MB in 104 requests on a phone: media 16.3 MB (6), scripts 2.2 MB (48) and fonts 559 KiB (28). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (131 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 5.5 g of CO₂ per visit
5.52 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.52 g of CO₂e: 662.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
39 text elements with low contrast
39 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (4 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (4 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 42 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 5 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 3 problems
Structured data found (EducationalOrganization, FAQPage, LocalBusiness and SiteNavigationElement) but with 3 problems, for example “FAQPage: no questions in mainEntity”.
89 internal links, 40 external
The homepage links to 89 pages on halcones.co and 40 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 135 characters
Your meta description is 135 characters: “Escuela de aviación en Medellín con +59 años de trayectoria. Formamos pilotos comerciales, privados y TCP. Certificados…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Escuela de aviación en Medellín Piloto Comercial y TCP certificados UAEAC”.
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Halcones Aviation School | Escuela de Aviación en Medellín”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://halcones.co/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://halcones.co/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details; logo would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,850 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (11 KiB, 45 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
6 pages share 3 titles
/estudiar-aviacion-medellin and /programas all use the title “Estudiar Aviación en Medellín | Programas aeronáuticos | Halcones”, and 2 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
6 pages share a meta description
/estudiar-aviacion-medellin and /programas use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
6 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 6 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /programa-piloto-comercial-de-avion, whose canonical is /piloto-comercial-de-avion. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
6 pages without an H1
/seguridad-operacional, /admision, /egresados, /blog-aviacion-halcones, /escuela-de-aviacion-en-medellin and /simuladores-de-vuelo-en-medellin have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
7 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.linkedin.com/company/escuela-de-aviacion-los-halcones/ (404).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://halcones.co/programa-piloto-comercial-de-avion.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (halcones.co).
Valid certificate (80 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for halcones.co and is valid for another 80 days.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://halcones.co redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
halcones.co has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 727 words of copy
The homepage carries about 727 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: a star rating and 4 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Email authentication
No DMARC policy
halcones.co has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.
SPF does not block other senders (?all)
Your SPF record doesn't end in -all or ~all, so it doesn't stop other servers sending as you: “v=spf1 ip4:38.113.1.0/24 ip4:38.113.20.0/24 ip4:65.254.224.0/19 include:websitewelcome.com ?all”.
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 25/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.3
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 42 issues on halcones.co, including 23 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.