Website review, no card needed

0-105.com logo

0-105.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202642 issues · 84 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on 0-105.com, 14 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.6 s1.2 sMay 23Nov 71.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Oct 31, 20261.4 s
Nov 7, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
127 ms111 msMay 23Nov 7117 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026120 ms
May 30, 2026121 ms
Jun 6, 2026124 ms
Jun 13, 2026125 ms
Jun 20, 2026124 ms
Jun 27, 2026121 ms
Jul 4, 2026122 ms
Jul 11, 2026121 ms
Jul 18, 2026119 ms
Jul 25, 2026119 ms
Aug 1, 2026117 ms
Aug 8, 2026117 ms
Aug 15, 2026117 ms
Aug 22, 2026118 ms
Aug 29, 2026114 ms
Sep 5, 2026113 ms
Sep 12, 2026113 ms
Sep 19, 2026114 ms
Sep 26, 2026117 ms
Oct 3, 2026120 ms
Oct 10, 2026122 ms
Oct 17, 2026119 ms
Oct 24, 2026117 ms
Oct 31, 2026118 ms
Nov 7, 2026117 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of 0-105.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. 0-105.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. 0-105.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. 0-105.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. 0-105.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. 0-105.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  6. 0-105.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  7. 0-105.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  8. 0-105.com at 4.2 s4.2 s

Speed

9 to fix35
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.8 s · 520 KiB

    22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (520 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.1 s · 423 KiB

    About 423 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.3 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 35

    35/100

    Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    900 ms · 187 KiB

    About 187 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    767 KiB

    6 images could be 767 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Font display

    350 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).

  • Main-thread work: 3.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 280 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    250 ms · 8 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (cloudflare.com, skeepers.io and sibautomation.com and others), adding 121 KiB and 108 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 21.6 s

    21.6 s

    Your largest element takes 21.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Slide background”.

  • Speed Index: 13.8 s

    13.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.3 s

    23.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.492

    0.492

    The layout shifts by 0.492 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 371 ms

    371 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 371 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 120 ms to 117 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 117 ms

    117 ms

    Real visitors wait 117 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 644 ms

    644 ms

    Real visitors wait 644 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix50
  • Page weight: 7.1 MB in 75 requests

    7.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.1 MB in 75 requests on a phone: images 3.8 MB (29), other files 1.4 MB (13) and scripts 867 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 12 images in older formats

    12 images (1.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    11 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example mobile_6aed80c35f77f.jpg at 1,200 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 11 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (128 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.02 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.02 g of CO₂e: 242.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8691
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 7 tap targets too small

    7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 6 images without alt text

    6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8285
  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (untyped) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Expected ',' or '}' after property value in JSON at position)”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 114 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 114 pages on 0-105.com and 7 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 141 characters

    Your meta description is 141 characters: “Discover the 0-105 women’s trainers: on-trend leather trainers that combine comfort and style. A premium French brand, …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Unique, stylish and comfortable trainers for everyday wear.”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Trendy & Premium Women and Men's Shoes | French Brand 0-105”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://0-105.com/1_index_sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://0-105.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (418 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 8 pages share 4 titles

    https://0-105.com/en and / all use the title “Trendy & Premium Women and Men's Shoes | French Brand 0-105”, and 3 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://0-105.com/en/gift-cards has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 pages share a meta description

    https://0-105.com/en/20-femme and https://0-105.com/en/20- use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 11 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 11 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://0-105.com/en/20-femme, whose canonical is https://0-105.com/en/20-women-s-sneakers. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 82 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 5 broken images

    5 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://0-105.com/en/.

  • 52 small tap targets

    52 of 64 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix79
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 293 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 293 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Register”, “Contact” and “My order”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 20 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at 0-105.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Powered by Creative Slider 6.6.9 - Multi-Purpose, Responsive
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
OVHcloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on 0-105.com, including 16 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25