Website review, no card needed

hapi.one logo

hapi.one website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202643 issues · 86 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on hapi.one, 16 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 16.5 MB in 65 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
8.9 s6.9 sMay 16Oct 318.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20268.5 s
May 23, 20268.4 s
May 30, 20267.8 s
Jun 6, 20267.5 s
Jun 13, 20267.2 s
Jun 20, 20267.1 s
Jun 27, 20267.6 s
Jul 4, 20267.6 s
Jul 11, 20268.2 s
Jul 18, 20268.7 s
Jul 25, 20268.2 s
Aug 1, 20268.4 s
Aug 8, 20268.2 s
Aug 15, 20268.0 s
Aug 22, 20268.2 s
Aug 29, 20268.1 s
Sep 5, 20268.1 s
Sep 12, 20267.8 s
Sep 19, 20267.3 s
Sep 26, 20267.3 s
Oct 3, 20267.7 s
Oct 10, 20267.8 s
Oct 17, 20268.4 s
Oct 24, 20268.5 s
Oct 31, 20268.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
301 ms184 msMay 16Oct 31287 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026217 ms
May 23, 2026226 ms
May 30, 2026232 ms
Jun 6, 2026243 ms
Jun 13, 2026243 ms
Jun 20, 2026226 ms
Jun 27, 2026226 ms
Jul 4, 2026216 ms
Jul 11, 2026216 ms
Jul 18, 2026214 ms
Jul 25, 2026214 ms
Aug 1, 2026215 ms
Aug 8, 2026226 ms
Aug 15, 2026230 ms
Aug 22, 2026238 ms
Aug 29, 2026243 ms
Sep 5, 2026243 ms
Sep 12, 2026238 ms
Sep 19, 2026210 ms
Sep 26, 2026197 ms
Oct 3, 2026210 ms
Oct 10, 2026231 ms
Oct 17, 2026266 ms
Oct 24, 2026274 ms
Oct 31, 2026287 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

8 to fix66
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    9.5 MB

    About 9.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.0 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Mobile performance score: 66

    66/100

    Your mobile performance score is 66. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    950 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    439 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (439 KiB).

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Fonts, web3modal.com and walletconnect.com and others), adding 3.9 MB and 1 ms of main-thread time.

  • Medium adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Medium costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 3.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 765 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    223 KiB

    1 image could be 223 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    41 KiB

    About 41 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    38 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 38 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    16 KiB

    16 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 8.6 s

    8.6 s

    Real visitors wait 8.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 8.5 s

    8.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 8.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 23.6 s

    23.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 23.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 66.5 s

    66.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 66.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 249 ms

    249 ms

    Real visitors wait 249 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 27% slower for real visitors

    +27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 217 ms to 287 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 8.5 s to 8.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.009

    0.009

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.009, good is under 0.1).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.5 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “with HAPI Tools”.

Images and page weight

3 to fix43
  • Page weight: 16.5 MB in 65 requests

    16.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 16.5 MB in 65 requests on a phone: scripts 11.5 MB (3), images 4.9 MB (18) and fonts 93 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    822 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example vadym.e5ccf57fc5f161f24f4c.webp at 672 px wide, shown at 108 px. Resized copies would save about 822 KiB.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (1.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.69 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.69 g of CO₂e: 562.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 7391
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 10 links without text

    10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 25 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 28 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 25 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 10064
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (13 characters)

    Your title is only 13 characters: “HAPI Protocol”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (234 characters)

    Your meta description is 234 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://hapi.one/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

2 checks passed
  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 887 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9296
  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix92
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (hapi.one).

  • Valid certificate (87 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for hapi.one and is valid for another 87 days.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://hapi.one redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

1 to fix
  • Domain expires in 45 days

    hapi.one is registered until Dec 2026. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.

  • No CAA record

    hapi.one has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    hapi.one's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

1 checks passed
  • Domain is 5 years old

    5 years

    hapi.one was registered in Dec 2020 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

Content and conversion

4 to fix40
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 887 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 887 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get Started” and “Try Our Tools”.

Email authentication

3 to fix0
  • No DMARC policy

    hapi.one has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No SPF record

    hapi.one has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 0/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Mixpanel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
DigitalOcean

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on hapi.one, including 17 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25