Website review, no card needed
headfield.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202638 issues · 102 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on headfield.com, 11 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 126 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 104 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.1 s20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
650 ms · 935 KiB62 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (935 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 70
70/100Your mobile performance score is 70. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
961 KiB15 images could be 961 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
460 ms · 110 KiBAbout 110 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 460 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
250 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).
Minify CSS
140 ms · 13 KiB13 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 50 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
10 ms · 3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
1 third-party service on the page
1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 67 KiB and 1 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.6 s
A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 88 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 7.5 s
7.5 sReal visitors wait 7.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.8 s
4.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.1 s
24.1 sYour largest element takes 24.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “HR consulting expertise that helps your business thrive.”.
Time to Interactive: 26.0 s
26.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 26.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 3.9 s
3.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
13 images without width and height
13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
6 checks passed
Real-user INP: 111 ms
111 msReal visitors wait 111 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 15% faster for real visitors
-15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors
-19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.6 s to 5.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.2 MB in 68 requests
8.2 MBYour homepage downloads 8.2 MB in 68 requests on a phone: images 7.7 MB (27), fonts 264 KiB (6) and stylesheets 118 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 6.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
6 images far larger than shown
535 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Freshers-Job-Opportunities-10-Tips-You-Must-Know-1280x908.jp at 1,280 px wide, shown at 328 px. Resized copies would save about 535 KiB.
14 images in older formats
14 images (7.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (979 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit
2.33 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.33 g of CO₂e: 279.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (29 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 29 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 37 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
31 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 35 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (19 characters)
Your title is only 19 characters: “Head Field Solution”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Heading Ahead.” and “Global Business”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
31 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 31 pages on headfield.com and 9 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://headfield.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://headfield.com/wp-sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (615 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
10 pages without a meta description
/contact, /about, /our-venture, /careers, /culture and /blog and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 pages without an H1
/contact, /about, /careers, /blog and /services have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
10 internal pages checked
We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (headfield.com).
Valid certificate (184 days left)
The certificate from SSL Corporation · SSL.com TLS Issuing RSA CA R1 verifies for headfield.com and is valid for another 184 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://headfield.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 20 links work
All 20 links checked from your homepage (11 internal, 9 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
headfield.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
headfield.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 19 years old
19 yearsheadfield.com was registered in Dec 2006 through NameCheap, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Dec 2031
headfield.com is registered until Dec 2031.
Content and conversion
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 558 words of copy
The homepage carries about 558 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT”.
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks and “200+ clients”.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be headfield.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 60/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
1 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all”.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2023.
- 1 plugin is behind its latest release.bold-page-builder 5.9.5 → 5.9.10
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.4
- Framework
- jQuery
- Hosting
- Namecheap
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on headfield.com, including 14 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.