Website review, no card needed

igm-group.com logo

igm-group.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202627 issues · 76 checks

This review found 27 issues worth fixing on igm-group.com, 5 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s873 msMay 2Oct 171.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.6 s
May 9, 20261.4 s
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.2 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
106 ms80 msMay 2Oct 1791 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202695 ms
May 9, 202689 ms
May 16, 202685 ms
May 23, 202683 ms
May 30, 202684 ms
Jun 6, 202691 ms
Jun 13, 202695 ms
Jun 20, 202695 ms
Jun 27, 202691 ms
Jul 4, 202690 ms
Jul 11, 202693 ms
Jul 18, 202689 ms
Jul 25, 202697 ms
Aug 1, 202696 ms
Aug 8, 202699 ms
Aug 15, 2026103 ms
Aug 22, 202697 ms
Aug 29, 2026100 ms
Sep 5, 202695 ms
Sep 12, 202687 ms
Sep 19, 202688 ms
Sep 26, 202688 ms
Oct 3, 202688 ms
Oct 10, 202690 ms
Oct 17, 202691 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of igm-group.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. igm-group.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. igm-group.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. igm-group.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. igm-group.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. igm-group.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. igm-group.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. igm-group.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. igm-group.com at 3.2 s3.2 s

Speed

4 to fix70
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.2 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.2 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 70

    70/100

    Your mobile performance score is 70 (desktop: 83). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    690 ms · 130 KiB

    About 130 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 690 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    620 ms · 95 KiB

    About 95 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 620 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (clickskeks.at), adding 69 KiB and 52 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 51 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    9 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    7 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 7 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 176 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    Your largest element takes 4.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Erdbewegung”. Most of its time is resource load delay (2.0 s).

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.156

    0.156

    The layout shifts by 0.156 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 5.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 15 images without width and height

    15 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 91 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.09

    0.09

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 1 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix97
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    07-verschiedenes.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.23 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.23 g of CO₂e: 28.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 848 KiB in 24 requests

    848 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 848 KiB in 24 requests on a phone: images 418 KiB (10), scripts 225 KiB (3) and stylesheets 111 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

Google 100100
  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h1 → h3 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 22 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 35 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 0 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9178
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 6 H1 headlines

    There are 6 <h1> headlines (“Applications”, “RTE 400 Robot” and “Trade Shows”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (168 characters)

    Your meta description is 168 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 33 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 33 pages on igm-group.com and 11 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Title: 61 characters

    Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “igm Robotersysteme AG - welding robot systems made in Austria”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.igm-group.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (346 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.igm-group.com/llms.txt (195 KiB, 0 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 8 pages without a meta description

    https://www.igm-group.com/en/news, https://www.igm-group.com/en/products, https://www.igm-group.com/en/applications, https://www.igm-group.com/en/downloads, https://www.igm-group.com/en/imprint and https://www.igm-group.com/en/data-protection and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://www.igm-group.com/en/news and https://www.igm-group.com/en/trade-shows have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 29 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 480 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 480 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “4 Contact”, “join us at Facebook” and “join us at Instagram”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at igm-group.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 27 issues on igm-group.com, including 14 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25