Website review, no card needed
imagem.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202631 issues · 96 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on imagem.com, 11 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 14.3 MB in 59 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 140 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 138 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 212 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
imagem.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 340 KiBAbout 340 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (privacy-mgmt.com, Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics and others), adding 9.1 MB and 298 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 75
75/100Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
ctfassets.net adds 0 ms
0 msctfassets.net costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 8.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
400 ms · 124 KiB7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (124 KiB).
Improve image delivery
255 KiB1 image could be 255 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 91 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
41 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.6 s
A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 730 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 85 ms
85 msYour server sent the HTML in 85 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 533 ms
533 msReal visitors wait 533 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 8.5 s
8.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 10.5 s
10.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 10.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sThe first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 53% slower for real visitors
+53%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 140 ms to 212 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sYour largest element takes 3.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “A new global music company with the scale, expertise, and t…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.5 s).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 38% faster for real visitors
-38%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 92 ms
92 msScripts block the page for only 92 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 14.3 MB in 59 requests
14.3 MBYour homepage downloads 14.3 MB in 59 requests on a phone: images 8.7 MB (19), other files 4.3 MB (12) and scripts 776 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
15 images far larger than shown
8.1 MB15 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Jason_Aldean_Photo_Credit_Spidey_Smith_-_Main_Press_Image.jp at 8,192 px wide, shown at 294 px. Resized copies would save about 8.1 MB.
6 images over 500 KB
6 images weigh 6.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
About 4.0 g of CO₂ per visit
4.05 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.05 g of CO₂e: 485.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 25 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (3 characters)
Your title is only 3 characters: “BMG”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is short (44 characters)
Your meta description is only 44 characters: “A Global Music Publishing and Record Company”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
24 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 24 pages on imagem.com and 5 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “BMG and Concord Complete Combination”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.bmg.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bmg.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Parts of the site are closed to 1 AI crawler
Your robots.txt lets Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.
3 checks passed
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (544 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (3 KiB, 15 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
14 pages share a meta description
/homepage, /publishing, /recording, /sync, /who-we-are and /careers and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
12 pages without an H1
/publishing, /recording, /sync, /who-we-are, /careers and /news and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
14 internal pages checked
We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 14 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
2 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://imagem.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.
2 links through redirect chains
2 links go through two or more redirects, for example http://youtube.com/bmg.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
9 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (bmg.com).
Valid certificate (169 days left)
The certificate from DigiCert Inc · RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1 verifies for imagem.com and is valid for another 169 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://imagem.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 20 links work
All 20 links checked from your homepage (15 internal, 5 external) answered without errors.
security.txt published
A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.
Domain and trust
DNSSEC is off
bmg.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
3 checks passed
Domain is 30 years old
30 yearsbmg.com was registered in Sep 1996 through Ascio Technologies, Inc. Danmark - Filial af Ascio technologies, Inc. USA. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only digicert.com and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for bmg.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
Registered until Sep 2027
bmg.com is registered until Sep 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 573 words of copy
The homepage carries about 573 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Contact Us”.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Hiring
- Hiring
- 980 open roles
- Job board
- smartrecruiters
- Careers page
- www.bmg.com/careers (opens in a new tab)
Company
- Founded
- 2008
- Headquarters
- Hilversum
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on imagem.com, including 15 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.