Website review, no card needed

imagesbazaar.com logo

imagesbazaar.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202649 issues · 88 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on imagesbazaar.com, 23 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s2.6 sMay 2Oct 173.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20264.1 s
May 9, 20264.1 s
May 16, 20263.8 s
May 23, 20263.7 s
May 30, 20263.7 s
Jun 6, 20263.4 s
Jun 13, 20263.5 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.8 s
Jul 4, 20263.7 s
Jul 11, 20263.9 s
Jul 18, 20263.7 s
Jul 25, 20263.6 s
Aug 1, 20263.9 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.4 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20263.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
286 ms166 msMay 2Oct 10195 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026242 ms
May 9, 2026272 ms
May 16, 2026224 ms
May 23, 2026242 ms
May 30, 2026224 ms
Jun 6, 2026216 ms
Jun 13, 2026228 ms
Jul 4, 2026238 ms
Jul 25, 2026194 ms
Aug 1, 2026257 ms
Aug 8, 2026230 ms
Aug 15, 2026232 ms
Aug 22, 2026224 ms
Aug 29, 2026224 ms
Sep 5, 2026251 ms
Sep 12, 2026241 ms
Sep 19, 2026180 ms
Sep 26, 2026183 ms
Oct 3, 2026196 ms
Oct 10, 2026195 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

10 to fix25
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    10.3 s · 4.7 MB

    41 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.7 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    8.4 s · 1.4 MB

    About 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.6 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.6 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.3 s · 257 KiB

    About 257 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 25

    25/100

    Your mobile performance score is 25 (desktop: 15). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.2 MB

    24 images could be 2.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and americanexpress.co.in and others), adding 3.6 MB and 621 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 483 ms

    483 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 483 ms of main-thread work and 707 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Amazon Web Services adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Amazon Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 2.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 228 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix28
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 23.9 s

    23.9 s

    Your largest element takes 23.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “India's diversity and complexity can be witnessed through i…”. Most of its time is element render delay (13.7 s).

  • Speed Index: 32.2 s

    32.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 32.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 32.7 s

    32.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 32.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.834

    0.834

    The layout shifts by 0.834 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 24 images without width and height

    24 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 279 ms

    279 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 279 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user TTFB: 773 ms

    773 ms

    Real visitors wait 773 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 242 ms to 195 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors

    -19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.8 MB in 73 requests

    5.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.8 MB in 73 requests on a phone: images 2.7 MB (26), scripts 2.6 MB (19) and stylesheets 272 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.63 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.63 g of CO₂e: 195.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 6781
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 26 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 35 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 26 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 10048
  • No page title

    Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.

  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://imagesbazaar.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

1 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix80
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

3 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (imagesbazaar.com).

  • Valid certificate (80 days left)

    The certificate from Sectigo Limited · Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36 verifies for imagesbazaar.com and is valid for another 80 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://imagesbazaar.com redirects to the secure version.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    imagesbazaar.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    imagesbazaar.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 21 years old

    21 years

    imagesbazaar.com was registered in Dec 2004 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Dec 2035

    imagesbazaar.com is registered until Dec 2035.

Content and conversion

5 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 61 words

    The homepage has only about 61 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be imagesbazaar.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
2003
Headquarters
New Delhi

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on imagesbazaar.com, including 19 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25