Website review, no card needed

incommonwith.com logo

incommonwith.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202629 issues · 81 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on incommonwith.com, 8 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.1 sMay 23Nov 72.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Oct 31, 20262.3 s
Nov 7, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
154 ms87 msMay 23Nov 7114 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026133 ms
May 30, 2026130 ms
Jun 6, 2026110 ms
Jun 13, 2026118 ms
Jun 20, 2026122 ms
Jun 27, 2026119 ms
Jul 4, 2026122 ms
Jul 11, 2026104 ms
Jul 18, 202696 ms
Jul 25, 2026105 ms
Aug 1, 2026117 ms
Aug 8, 2026122 ms
Aug 15, 2026127 ms
Aug 22, 2026123 ms
Aug 29, 2026146 ms
Sep 5, 2026146 ms
Sep 12, 2026129 ms
Sep 19, 2026128 ms
Sep 26, 202695 ms
Oct 3, 202698 ms
Oct 10, 2026107 ms
Oct 17, 2026104 ms
Oct 24, 2026105 ms
Oct 31, 2026108 ms
Nov 7, 2026114 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of incommonwith.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. incommonwith.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. incommonwith.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. incommonwith.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. incommonwith.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. incommonwith.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. incommonwith.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. incommonwith.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. incommonwith.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

5 to fix82
  • Mobile performance score: 82

    82/100

    Your mobile performance score is 82. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 290 KiB

    About 290 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    500 ms

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    295 KiB

    14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (295 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    280 KiB

    4 images could be 280 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Klaviyo and Pinterest and others), adding 573 KiB and 226 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 162 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    31 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    16 KiB

    About 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 730 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Your largest element takes 3.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Menu”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.5 s).

7 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 91 ms

    91 ms

    Real visitors wait 91 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 619 ms

    619 ms

    Real visitors wait 619 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 133 ms to 114 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 91 ms

    91 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 91 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 153 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 153 requests on a phone: scripts 909 KiB (54), images 755 KiB (18) and other files 639 KiB (70). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.71 g of CO₂e: 85.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fix88
  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9272
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (14 characters)

    Your title is only 14 characters: “In Common With”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (162 characters)

    Your meta description is 162 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 47 internal links, 18 external

    The homepage links to 47 pages on incommonwith.com and 18 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.incommonwith.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.incommonwith.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (633 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.incommonwith.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 7 pages share a meta description

    https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/lido, https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/sconces, https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/pendants, https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/floor-lamps, https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/surface-mounts and https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/chandeliers and 1 other use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/lido, https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/sconces, https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/pendants, https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/floor-lamps, https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/surface-mounts and https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/chandeliers and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.incommonwith.com/pages/collections/custom-saga has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 6 pages slow to respond

    https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/chandeliers, https://www.incommonwith.com/collections/table-lamps, https://www.incommonwith.com/products/murano-glass-up-down-sconce, https://www.incommonwith.com/products/ceramic-disc-surface-mount, https://www.incommonwith.com/pages/trade-program and https://www.incommonwith.com/pages/collections/custom-saga took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 33 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 711 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 711 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More”.

  • 27 calls to action

    The homepage has 27 calls to action, for example “Shop the Sconces collection”, “Shop the Pendants collection” and “Shop the Floor Lamps collection”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 3 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 24 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at incommonwith.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 7 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Helium Customer Fields · Stack Discounts Pro · hulkapps.com · shareasale.com · amazonaws.com · cloudfront.net

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Hiring

Hiring
3 open roles
Teams
Supply Chain (2), Finance (1)
Job board
greenhouse

Company

Headquarters
New York

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on incommonwith.com, including 11 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25