Website review, no card needed
inkster.fr website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202648 issues · 94 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on inkster.fr, 21 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63D- #95,087 of 99,948 reviewed websitesbeats 4%
- #53,689 of 54,914 online storesbeats 2%
- #48,975 of 49,854 Shopify storesbeats 1%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 220 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 218 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 201 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
3.1 s
6.3 s
9.4 s
12.5 s
15.7 s
18.8 s
21.9 s
25.1 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.3 s · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.3 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 29.1 s
A phone's processor spends 29.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 16.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Shopify adds 2.4 s
2.4 sShopify costs a phone 2.4 s of main-thread work and 779 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.4 s
1.4 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 800 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 1.3 s
1.3 sKlaviyo costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 404 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
ablyft.com adds 1.2 s
1.2 sablyft.com costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 36 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
10,257 HTML elements
The page has 10,257 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Render-blocking requests
1.0 s15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.
Mobile performance score: 29
29/100Your mobile performance score is 29. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo and others), adding 2.4 MB and 7.3 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
650 ms · 288 KiB29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (288 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
570 ms · 85 KiBAbout 85 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 570 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 557 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Clarity adds 346 ms
346 msClarity costs a phone 346 ms of main-thread work and 28 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
300 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 56 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 56 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
16 KiB16 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Improve image delivery
15 KiB3 images could be 15 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 20 ms
20 msYour server sent the HTML in 20 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 19.7 s
19.7 sYour largest element takes 19.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 21.3 s
21.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 21.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 7.7 s
7.7 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 7.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 31.8 s
31.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 202 ms
202 msReal visitors wait 202 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 220 ms to 201 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 366 ms
366 msReal visitors wait 366 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.9 MB in 362 requests
4.9 MBYour homepage downloads 4.9 MB in 362 requests on a phone: scripts 2.8 MB (131), images 878 KiB (121) and other files 808 KiB (85). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.38 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.38 g of CO₂e: 165.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
3 buttons without a name
3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
15 images without alt text
15 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
53 links without text
53 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).
1 checks passed
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 8 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
6 H1 headlines
There are 6 <h1> headlines (“”, “” and “”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
441 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 441 pages on inkster.fr and 2 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “Nos tatouages durent 1 à 2 semaines et s'estompent au fur et à mesure que ta peau se régénère naturellement. encre végé…”.
Title: 45 characters
Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “Inkster - Tatouages naturels de deux semaines”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://inkster.fr/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://inkster.fr/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,260 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://inkster.fr/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages share a title
https://inkster.fr/collections/alle-produkte, https://inkster.fr/collections/anime-drop and https://inkster.fr/collections/outlet all use the title “Tous les tatouages temporaires | Inkster”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
5 pages without a meta description
https://inkster.fr/collections/maskulin, https://inkster.fr/collections/custom-tattoos, https://inkster.fr/collections/komplementarprodukte, https://inkster.fr/pages/unser-team and https://inkster.fr/collections/tattoo-sleeves have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://inkster.fr/collections/alle-produkte and https://inkster.fr/collections/outlet use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 pages without an H1
https://inkster.fr/collections/alle-produkte, https://inkster.fr/collections/neue-designs, https://inkster.fr/collections/maskulin, https://inkster.fr/collections/anime-drop, https://inkster.fr/collections/tattoo-stift-alle-produkte and https://inkster.fr/products/winter-starter-set-deal and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 88 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://inkster.fr/.
31 small tap targets
31 of 109 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET”.
Requests the notification permission on page load
Requests the notification permission on page load.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 6 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 854 words of copy
The homepage carries about 854 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more” and “Shop now”.
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Aide & Contact”, “Aide & ContactAide & Contact” and “Tattoo Design Book”.
131 short forms
131 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Hotjar.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Klaviyo and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
31 cookies set on arrival
31Opening the homepage sets 31 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
61 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 61 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at inkster.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 21 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Pandectes Gdpr · Sitemap Noindex Pro Seo · Rapid Search Bar Filter · Hive · Instant Ai Page Builder · Teeinblue Product Personalizer · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Hive Logistics Services · Orbe Geolocation · Pushowl · Countdown Timer · Reviews Co Uk Product And Merchant Review Collection · Gift Box Builder · zoko.io · azureedge.net · selecdoo.com · linkster.co · goaffpro.com · Swym Wishlist Plus
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Hotjar | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on inkster.fr, including 25 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.