inprocorp.com website review

18 images could be 1.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.9 s faster on a phone.

7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.

Your mobile performance score is 68 (desktop: 95). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

About 94 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 480 ms faster on a phone.

Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).

site.com costs a phone 3 ms of main-thread work and 796 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5 KiB).

2 third-party services load with your homepage (site.com and Bootstrap CDN), adding 803 KiB and 3 ms of main-thread time.

1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 55 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

Desktop scores 95 but mobile only 68. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

Your largest element takes 9.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Home Slider # 1”.

The page becomes fully interactive after 9.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 155 ms to 179 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 52 requests on a phone: images 2.9 MB (34), fonts 154 KiB (6) and stylesheets 134 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example MC64LLZA2ALNDNJI5V7R6AO6YBFU at 1,440 px wide, shown at 356 px. Resized copies would save about 134 KiB.

4 images further down the page (113 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.91 g of CO₂e: 109.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

Heading levels should only increase by one: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names. (1 element).

1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.

No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

A phone browser shows 775 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

Your robots.txt lets Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

There is no https://www.inprocorp.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

4 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The source list for Content Security Policy directive 'script-src' contains a source with an invalid path: 'https://www.inprocorp.com/customer/A…”.

We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 775 words of visible text.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.