Website review, no card needed

insales.ru logo

insales.ru website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202650 issues · 93 checks

This review found 50 issues worth fixing on insales.ru, 19 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.5 sMay 2Oct 173.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.6 s
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.2 s
Oct 17, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
193 ms130 msMay 2Oct 17157 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026185 ms
May 9, 2026186 ms
May 16, 2026182 ms
May 23, 2026178 ms
May 30, 2026172 ms
Jun 6, 2026164 ms
Jun 13, 2026157 ms
Jun 20, 2026150 ms
Jun 27, 2026154 ms
Jul 4, 2026152 ms
Jul 11, 2026155 ms
Jul 18, 2026154 ms
Jul 25, 2026145 ms
Aug 1, 2026145 ms
Aug 8, 2026138 ms
Aug 15, 2026137 ms
Aug 22, 2026139 ms
Aug 29, 2026144 ms
Sep 5, 2026144 ms
Sep 12, 2026144 ms
Sep 19, 2026143 ms
Sep 26, 2026140 ms
Oct 3, 2026146 ms
Oct 10, 2026152 ms
Oct 17, 2026157 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of insales.ru (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. insales.ru at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. insales.ru at 2.3 s2.3 s
  3. insales.ru at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. insales.ru at 4.6 s4.6 s
  5. insales.ru at 5.7 s5.7 s
  6. insales.ru at 6.9 s6.9 s
  7. insales.ru at 8.0 s8.0 s
  8. insales.ru at 9.2 s9.2 s

Speed

9 to fix41
  • Improve image delivery

    1.8 s · 1.7 MB

    16 images could be 1.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.0 s

    25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.0 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 41

    41/100

    Your mobile performance score is 41 (desktop: 49). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (insales-shop.ru, Yandex Metrica and mindbox.ru and others), adding 5.4 MB and 764 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    350 ms · 634 KiB

    26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (634 KiB).

  • insales-shop.ru adds 444 ms

    444 ms

    insales-shop.ru costs a phone 444 ms of main-thread work and 3.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 299 KiB

    About 299 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • mindbox.ru adds 97 ms

    97 ms

    mindbox.ru costs a phone 97 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 57 KiB

    57 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 18 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 73 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    57 KiB

    About 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify CSS

    16 KiB

    16 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 144 ms

    144 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 144 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.2 s

    17.2 s

    Your largest element takes 17.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.9 s

    22.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.4 s

    10.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.464

    0.464

    The layout shifts by 0.464 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.24

    0.24

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.24 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 21% slower for real visitors

    +21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 30 images without width and height

    30 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 186 ms

    186 ms

    Real visitors wait 186 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 185 ms to 157 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 14 ms

    14 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 14 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix28
  • Page weight: 5.8 MB in 161 requests

    5.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.8 MB in 161 requests on a phone: images 4.4 MB (56), scripts 849 KiB (40) and fonts 282 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    sber2b_baner_2560.png weighs 760 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 16 images in older formats

    16 images (2.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 10 images below the first screen load straight away

    10 images further down the page (909 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    117 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Redirect.gif at 150 px wide, shown at 23 px. Resized copies would save about 117 KiB.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.63 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.63 g of CO₂e: 195.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7684
  • 15 text elements with low contrast

    15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 17 images without alt text

    17 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (54 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 54 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

1 checks passed
  • 36 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9289
  • Title is long (69 characters)

    Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Создайте интернет-магазин бесплатно и продавайте онлайн через inSales”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 106 internal links, 26 external

    The homepage links to 106 pages on insales.ru and 26 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “inSales — единый инструмент для всех каналов интернет-продаж: создайте интернет-магазин, продавайте через маркетплейсы,…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Платформа для управления онлайн-бизнесом Сбер2В”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.insales.ru/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.insales.ru/sitemap-custom.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.insales.ru/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

1 to fix75
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.insales.ru/page/hosting, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 9 pages with very little text

    https://www.insales.ru/blogs/updates/sber-transformiroval-chast-ekosistemi-yurlits-v-sber2b, https://www.insales.ru/collection/themes, https://www.insales.ru/collection/apps, https://www.insales.ru/page/delivery, https://www.insales.ru/page/dialogues-plus and https://www.insales.ru/seo and 3 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 6 pages slow to respond

    https://www.insales.ru/page/dialogues-plus, https://www.insales.ru/page/ai-analyst, https://www.insales.ru/seo, https://www.insales.ru/page/move-to-insales, https://www.insales.ru/page/marketplaces-start and https://www.insales.ru/page/custom-website took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 4679
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://ev.adriver.ru/cgi-bin/rle.cgi?sid=1&ad=774375&bt=21&cid=A-U5ayzsUAcIBaDvm0EcP4A&custom=180=1&pass=A-U5ayzsUAcIBaDvm0EcP4A.

  • 10 third-party cookies

    10 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    27 of 31 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Only about 61 words

    The homepage has only about 61 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 8 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Yandex Metrica (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 24 cookies set on arrival

    24

    Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at insales.ru, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 50 issues on insales.ru, including 21 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25