Website review, no card needed
internet-arts.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202620 issues · 66 checks
This review found 20 issues worth fixing on internet-arts.com, 2 of them high impact, across 66 checks. The most urgent: 40 text elements with low contrast. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
86BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.4 s
2.9 s
3.4 s
3.9 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
700 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 700 ms.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
201 KiB1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (201 KiB).
Document request latency
37 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
1 third-party service on the page
1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 97 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 97
97/100Your mobile performance score is 97. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.3 s
A phone's processor spends 0.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 35 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 232 ms
232 msYour server sent the HTML in 232 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
5 checks passed
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sYour largest element renders in 2.0 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Lovable, v0, Bolt, Cursor — they ship fast and break faster…”.
Speed Index: 2.4 s
2.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.4 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Time to Interactive: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe page is fully interactive after 2.0 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
1 image far larger than shown
66 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example founder.png at 512 px wide, shown at 140 px. Resized copies would save about 66 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (201 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (201 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.10 g of CO₂ per visit
0.10 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.10 g of CO₂e: 11.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 353 KiB in 6 requests
353 KiBYour homepage downloads 353 KiB in 6 requests on a phone: images 201 KiB (1), fonts 95 KiB (3) and HTML 55 KiB (1). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
40 text elements with low contrast
40 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (46 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 46 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 1 image in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
23 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 27 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 23 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://internet-arts.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at internet-arts.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
8 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 8 pages on internet-arts.com and 1 external page.
2 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “We fix your broken code.”.
Title: 39 characters
Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “Internet-Arts Brazil — We Fix Your Code”.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://internet-arts.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (993 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
https://internet-arts.com/index-pt.php, https://internet-arts.com/index-es.php and https://internet-arts.com/index-de.php have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 internal pages checked
We fetched 3 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 3 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 3 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 small tap targets
4 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 5 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 965 words of copy
The homepage carries about 965 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get a quote →”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Get a quote →”.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at internet-arts.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Hetzner
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 20 issues on internet-arts.com, including 2 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.