Website review, no card needed

ioasys.com.br logo

ioasys.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202643 issues · 77 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on ioasys.com.br, 16 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
7.3 s5.2 sMay 16Oct 246.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20265.8 s
May 23, 20265.8 s
May 30, 20265.8 s
Jun 13, 20265.7 s
Jun 27, 20265.5 s
Jul 4, 20266.1 s
Jul 11, 20266.5 s
Jul 18, 20266.9 s
Jul 25, 20266.9 s
Aug 1, 20266.2 s
Aug 8, 20266.1 s
Aug 22, 20266.3 s
Sep 5, 20267.1 s
Oct 10, 20266.7 s
Oct 17, 20266.3 s
Oct 24, 20266.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
137 ms102 msMay 16Jul 4106 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026115 ms
May 23, 2026133 ms
May 30, 2026122 ms
Jun 13, 2026122 ms
Jul 4, 2026106 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ioasys.com.br (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ioasys.com.br at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. ioasys.com.br at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. ioasys.com.br at 3.2 s3.2 s
  4. ioasys.com.br at 4.3 s4.3 s
  5. ioasys.com.br at 5.4 s5.4 s
  6. ioasys.com.br at 6.5 s6.5 s
  7. ioasys.com.br at 7.5 s7.5 s
  8. ioasys.com.br at 8.6 s8.6 s

Speed

11 to fix23
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.7 s · 909 KiB

    About 909 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 23

    23/100

    Your mobile performance score is 23. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 6.0 MB

    50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.0 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    3.8 MB

    1 image could be 3.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, TikTok and Facebook and others), adding 1.4 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    800 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 631 ms

    631 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 631 ms of main-thread work and 527 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 54 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 54 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 276 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google CDN adds 165 ms

    165 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 165 ms of main-thread work and 352 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 113 ms

    113 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 113 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    Real visitors wait 6.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.70

    0.70

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.70 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.3 s

    17.3 s

    Your largest element takes 17.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “technology”. Most of its time is element render delay (8.2 s).

  • Time to Interactive: 17.5 s

    17.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.65

    0.65

    The layout shifts by 0.65 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 9.9 s

    9.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 846 ms

    846 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 846 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 37 images without width and height

    37 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 115 ms to 106 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.8 s to 6.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

3 to fix45
  • Page weight: 11.8 MB in 123 requests

    11.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.8 MB in 123 requests on a phone: media 5.7 MB (2), images 4.2 MB (52) and scripts 1.8 MB (37). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    ioasys-inicio-hero-image.gif weighs 4.1 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (4.1 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 3.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.35 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.35 g of CO₂e: 402.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8892
  • Images must have alternative text (1 element)

    Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 9164
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (6 characters)

    Your title is only 6 characters: “ioasys”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://ioasys.com.br/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at ioasys.com.br/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 35 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 35 pages on ioasys.com.br and 10 external pages.

1 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “ioasys is a digital efficiency company that boosts people, companies and futures through innovations that accelerate th…”.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://ioasys.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (412 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://ioasys.com.br/en and / all use the title “ioasys”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://ioasys.com.br/en/insights/divulgacao-de-transparencia-salarial-25-01 and https://ioasys.com.br/en/insights/1154 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    /, https://ioasys.com.br/en/about-us, https://ioasys.com.br/en/our-solutions, https://ioasys.com.br/en/our-solutions/digital-products, https://ioasys.com.br/en/our-solutions/strategy-acceleration and https://ioasys.com.br/en/our-solutions/data-ai and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://ioasys.com.br/en/cases has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    / and https://ioasys.com.br/en/our-solutions/culture-learning took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 14 small tap targets

    14 of 22 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix80
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 35 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 411 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 411 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact us”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ioasys.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
Nuxt
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on ioasys.com.br, including 20 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25