Website review, no card needed
ipinnovative.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202635 issues · 99 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on ipinnovative.com, 11 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 104 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.7 s
3.3 s
5.0 s
6.6 s
8.3 s
9.9 s
11.6 s
13.2 s
ipinnovative.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
4.2 s11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.2 s.
Improve image delivery
5.3 MB12 images could be 5.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
870 ms · 162 KiBAbout 162 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 870 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 78). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 21 KiBAbout 21 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 15 KiB15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (ShareThis, jQuery CDN and Bootstrap CDN and others), adding 415 KiB and 105 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
55 KiB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (55 KiB).
Document request latency
32 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Minify CSS
17 KiB17 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.6 s
A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 119 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 436 ms
436 msYour server sent the HTML in 436 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.5 s
9.5 sYour largest element takes 9.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Welcome to IP Innovative Publication, an open access journa…”. Most of its time is element render delay (6.4 s).
Speed Index: 11.9 s
11.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s
4.7 sThe first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 9.5 s
9.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 9.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
9 images without width and height
9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 102 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 102 ms
102 msReal visitors wait 102 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.8 MB in 91 requests
6.8 MBYour homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 91 requests on a phone: images 6.2 MB (32), fonts 262 KiB (8) and stylesheets 190 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 3.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
3.6 MB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 1792123819_ijirm-cover-page.jpg at 2,400 px wide, shown at 166 px. Resized copies would save about 3.6 MB.
6 images in older formats
6 images (4.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (4.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.93 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.93 g of CO₂e: 231.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
32 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 35 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 32 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://ipinnovative.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at ipinnovative.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
47 internal links, 19 external
The homepage links to 47 pages on ipinnovative.com and 19 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 128 characters
Your meta description is 128 characters: “Explore the latest scholarly journals, research papers, and academic publications with open access and high-quality pee…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Publish with Us”.
Title: 32 characters
Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Home - IP Innovative Publication”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://ipinnovative.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebPage.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (480 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a meta description
/journals and /open-access-journals use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
7 pages without an H1
/journals, /contact, /journals/ijirm, /journals/sajhp, /journals/jaoh and /journals/ijooo and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
9 pages slow to respond
/journals-subscription-price-list, /resources, /journals-resources, /subscription, /journals/ijirm and /journals/sajhp and 3 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.
5 distorted images
5 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
23 of 24 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/1.1 only
The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (ipinnovative.com).
Valid certificate (74 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for ipinnovative.com and is valid for another 74 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://ipinnovative.com redirects to the secure version.
All 53 links work
All 53 links checked from your homepage (36 internal, 17 external) answered without errors; 12 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
ipinnovative.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
ipinnovative.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 6 years old
6 yearsipinnovative.com was registered in Jul 2020 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jul 2027
ipinnovative.com is registered until Jul 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 6 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 449 words of copy
The homepage carries about 449 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Publish your book”, “Book publication proposal” and “Contact Us”.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:139.84.163.27 include:spf-c.mailbaby.net +a +mx ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “default”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads The Trade Desk (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
14 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
Company
- Founded
- 2010
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 35 issues on ipinnovative.com, including 13 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.