Website review, no card needed

ipinnovative.com logo

ipinnovative.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202635 issues · 99 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on ipinnovative.com, 11 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s2.0 sMay 2Oct 172.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.1 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
124 ms91 msMay 2Oct 17104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026102 ms
May 9, 202695 ms
May 16, 2026101 ms
May 23, 2026102 ms
May 30, 2026103 ms
Jun 6, 2026109 ms
Jun 13, 2026106 ms
Jun 20, 2026109 ms
Jun 27, 2026113 ms
Jul 4, 2026111 ms
Jul 11, 2026110 ms
Jul 18, 2026102 ms
Jul 25, 202698 ms
Aug 1, 202699 ms
Aug 8, 2026102 ms
Aug 15, 2026108 ms
Aug 22, 2026111 ms
Aug 29, 2026113 ms
Sep 5, 2026116 ms
Sep 12, 2026113 ms
Sep 19, 2026120 ms
Sep 26, 2026115 ms
Oct 3, 2026113 ms
Oct 10, 2026105 ms
Oct 17, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ipinnovative.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ipinnovative.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  2. ipinnovative.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  3. ipinnovative.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  4. ipinnovative.com at 6.6 s6.6 s
  5. ipinnovative.com at 8.3 s8.3 s
  6. ipinnovative.com at 9.9 s9.9 s
  7. ipinnovative.com at 11.6 s11.6 s
  8. ipinnovative.com at 13.2 s13.2 s

ipinnovative.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

4 to fix57
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.2 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.2 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    5.3 MB

    12 images could be 5.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    870 ms · 162 KiB

    About 162 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 870 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 78). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 21 KiB

    About 21 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 15 KiB

    15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (ShareThis, jQuery CDN and Bootstrap CDN and others), adding 415 KiB and 105 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    55 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (55 KiB).

  • Document request latency

    32 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Minify CSS

    17 KiB

    17 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 119 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 436 ms

    436 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 436 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.5 s

    9.5 s

    Your largest element takes 9.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Welcome to IP Innovative Publication, an open access journa…”. Most of its time is element render delay (6.4 s).

  • Speed Index: 11.9 s

    11.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.5 s

    9.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 9 images without width and height

    9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 102 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 102 ms

    102 ms

    Real visitors wait 102 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 6.8 MB in 91 requests

    6.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 91 requests on a phone: images 6.2 MB (32), fonts 262 KiB (8) and stylesheets 190 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 3.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    3.6 MB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 1792123819_ijirm-cover-page.jpg at 2,400 px wide, shown at 166 px. Resized copies would save about 3.6 MB.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (4.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (4.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.93 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.93 g of CO₂e: 231.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 8794
  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 32 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 35 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 32 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10089
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://ipinnovative.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at ipinnovative.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 47 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 47 pages on ipinnovative.com and 19 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 128 characters

    Your meta description is 128 characters: “Explore the latest scholarly journals, research papers, and academic publications with open access and high-quality pee…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Publish with Us”.

  • Title: 32 characters

    Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Home - IP Innovative Publication”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://ipinnovative.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebPage.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (480 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /journals and /open-access-journals use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 7 pages without an H1

    /journals, /contact, /journals/ijirm, /journals/sajhp, /journals/jaoh and /journals/ijooo and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 9 pages slow to respond

    /journals-subscription-price-list, /resources, /journals-resources, /subscription, /journals/ijirm and /journals/sajhp and 3 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 6988
  • 3 third-party cookies

    3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.

  • 5 distorted images

    5 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    23 of 24 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HTTP/1.1 only

    The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (ipinnovative.com).

  • Valid certificate (74 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for ipinnovative.com and is valid for another 74 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://ipinnovative.com redirects to the secure version.

  • All 53 links work

    All 53 links checked from your homepage (36 internal, 17 external) answered without errors; 12 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    ipinnovative.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    ipinnovative.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 6 years old

    6 years

    ipinnovative.com was registered in Jul 2020 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Jul 2027

    ipinnovative.com is registered until Jul 2027.

Content and conversion

3 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 449 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 449 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Publish your book”, “Book publication proposal” and “Contact Us”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:139.84.163.27 include:spf-c.mailbaby.net +a +mx ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “default”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads The Trade Desk (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
jQuery

Company

Founded
2010

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 35 issues on ipinnovative.com, including 13 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25