ipesoft.com website review

About 668 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.

3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.5 s.

Your mobile performance score is 41 (desktop: 67). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

8 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, Google Tag Manager and hsappstatic.net and others), adding 2.8 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.

10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (195 KiB).

website-files.com costs a phone 453 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

hsappstatic.net costs a phone 450 ms of main-thread work and 713 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

Google Tag Manager costs a phone 452 ms of main-thread work and 511 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 338 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

11 images could be 278 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

About 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 110 ms faster on a phone.

Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

Desktop scores 67 but mobile only 41. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

The first text or image appears after 10.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

Your largest element takes 16.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

The page becomes fully interactive after 17.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 10.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 570 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

39 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

Your homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 94 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (29), images 629 KiB (33) and fonts 408 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

5 images (269 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

4 images further down the page (235 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.83 g of CO₂e: 99.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 33 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

Your title is only 7 characters: “Ipesoft”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

The homepage links to 46 pages on ipesoft.com and 5 external pages.

There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

/ochrana-sukromia and /projekty are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

/ochrana-sukromia and /projekty have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

/expertiza and /kto-sme use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected token '.'”.

Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

ipesoft.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 850 words of visible text.

DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be ipesoft.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.