Website review, no card needed

isero.nl logo

isero.nl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202644 issues · 89 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on isero.nl, 17 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s2.0 sMay 9Oct 242.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.2 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
275 ms231 msMay 9Oct 24237 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026260 ms
May 16, 2026256 ms
May 23, 2026256 ms
May 30, 2026260 ms
Jun 6, 2026256 ms
Jun 13, 2026259 ms
Jun 20, 2026258 ms
Jun 27, 2026258 ms
Jul 4, 2026261 ms
Jul 11, 2026262 ms
Jul 18, 2026260 ms
Jul 25, 2026257 ms
Aug 1, 2026254 ms
Aug 8, 2026256 ms
Aug 15, 2026262 ms
Aug 22, 2026264 ms
Aug 29, 2026270 ms
Sep 5, 2026267 ms
Sep 12, 2026262 ms
Sep 19, 2026254 ms
Sep 26, 2026248 ms
Oct 3, 2026242 ms
Oct 10, 2026238 ms
Oct 17, 2026236 ms
Oct 24, 2026237 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of isero.nl (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. isero.nl at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. isero.nl at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. isero.nl at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. isero.nl at 3.6 s3.6 s
  5. isero.nl at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. isero.nl at 5.5 s5.5 s
  7. isero.nl at 6.4 s6.4 s
  8. isero.nl at 7.3 s7.3 s

Speed

10 to fix31
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.8 s · 1.8 MB

    About 1.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.8 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 2.8 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 31

    31/100

    Your mobile performance score is 31 (desktop: 33). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, trengo.eu and omappapi.com and others), adding 1.7 MB and 997 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    610 ms · 176 KiB

    About 176 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 610 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 491 ms

    491 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 491 ms of main-thread work and 713 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    400 ms · 109 KiB

    32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (109 KiB).

  • trengo.eu adds 210 ms

    210 ms

    trengo.eu costs a phone 210 ms of main-thread work and 407 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Maps adds 130 ms

    130 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 130 ms of main-thread work and 366 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 120 KiB

    11 images could be 120 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 230 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify CSS

    22 KiB

    22 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 15 ms

    15 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 11.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 18.7 s

    18.7 s

    Your largest element takes 18.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “voltreffer juni banner”.

  • Time to Interactive: 27.1 s

    27.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 27.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.2 s

    13.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 244 ms

    244 ms

    Real visitors wait 244 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.24

    0.24

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.24 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • 23 images without width and height

    23 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 260 ms to 237 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 678 ms

    678 ms

    Real visitors wait 678 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 28% faster for real visitors

    -28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.041

    0.041

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.041, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.4 MB in 175 requests

    4.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.4 MB in 175 requests on a phone: scripts 3.4 MB (58), images 339 KiB (47) and fonts 292 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.25 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.25 g of CO₂e: 149.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7689
  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 8 buttons without a name

    8 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9270
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (112 characters)

    Your title is 112 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Isero | Dé groothandel voor hang- en sluitwerk, gereedschap, bevestigingsmiddelen en werk…”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.isero.nl/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 12 links crawlers can't follow

    12 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 173 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 173 pages on isero.nl and 6 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 88 characters

    Your meta description is 88 characters: “Dé groothandel voor hang- en sluitwerk, gereedschap, bevestigingsmiddelen en werkkleding”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.isero.nl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.isero.nl/nl-nl and https://www.isero.nl/nl-nl/store-finder all use the title “Isero | Dé groothandel voor hang- en sluitwerk, gereedschap, bevestig…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.isero.nl/nl-nl/store-finder has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.isero.nl/nl-nl/store-finder has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 8 pages slow to respond

    https://www.isero.nl/nl-nl/sleutels-nu, https://www.isero.nl/nl-nl/sleutelplan, https://www.isero.nl/nl-nl/bewegwijzering-binnen-buiten, https://www.isero.nl/nl-nl/deurbeslag-raambeslag-veiligheidsbeslag-sleutelplan-voor-woning-of-bedrijfspand, https://www.isero.nl/nl-nl/postkasten and https://www.isero.nl/nl-nl/mechanisch-elektronisch-sleutelbeheer and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 85 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    11 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 11 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 15 small tap targets

    15 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 93 words

    The homepage has only about 93 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at isero.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Angular
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Imperva

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on isero.nl, including 19 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25