Website review, no card needed

iseib.edu.br logo

iseib.edu.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202644 issues · 81 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on iseib.edu.br, 18 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s1.1 sMay 2Oct 171.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.4 s
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
171 ms96 msMay 2Oct 17156 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026112 ms
May 9, 2026111 ms
May 16, 2026117 ms
May 23, 2026117 ms
May 30, 2026120 ms
Jun 6, 2026123 ms
Jun 13, 2026115 ms
Jun 20, 2026111 ms
Jun 27, 2026105 ms
Jul 4, 2026109 ms
Jul 11, 2026107 ms
Jul 18, 2026113 ms
Jul 25, 2026121 ms
Aug 1, 2026117 ms
Aug 8, 2026119 ms
Aug 15, 2026118 ms
Aug 22, 2026118 ms
Aug 29, 2026130 ms
Sep 5, 2026142 ms
Sep 12, 2026146 ms
Sep 19, 2026156 ms
Sep 26, 2026156 ms
Oct 3, 2026162 ms
Oct 10, 2026157 ms
Oct 17, 2026156 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of iseib.edu.br (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. iseib.edu.br at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. iseib.edu.br at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. iseib.edu.br at 2.4 s2.4 s
  4. iseib.edu.br at 3.2 s3.2 s
  5. iseib.edu.br at 4.0 s4.0 s
  6. iseib.edu.br at 4.8 s4.8 s
  7. iseib.edu.br at 5.6 s5.6 s
  8. iseib.edu.br at 6.4 s6.4 s

Speed

7 to fix49
  • Improve image delivery

    7.2 s · 5.1 MB

    10 images could be 5.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.5 s · 2.1 MB

    About 2.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.5 s faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    YouTube costs a phone 1.7 s of main-thread work and 3.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 71). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 4.5 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 71 KiB

    About 71 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 183 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3 KiB).

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 17 ms

    17 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 27.3 s

    27.3 s

    Your largest element takes 27.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Administração”.

  • Time to Interactive: 36.6 s

    36.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 36.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 40% slower for real visitors

    +40%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 156 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 408 ms

    408 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 408 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 374 ms

    374 ms

    Real visitors wait 374 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 38% faster for real visitors

    -38%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.026

    0.026

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.026, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix38
  • Page weight: 10.2 MB in 81 requests

    10.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.2 MB in 81 requests on a phone: images 5.7 MB (15), scripts 3.5 MB (22) and fonts 451 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images over 500 KB

    5 images weigh 3.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 11 images in older formats

    11 images (4.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 8 images below the first screen load straight away

    8 images further down the page (3.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.89 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.89 g of CO₂e: 347.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8792
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 17 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

9 to fixGoogle 9257
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (16 characters)

    Your title is only 16 characters: “Faculdades ISEIB”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (40 characters)

    Your meta description is only 40 characters: “Faculdades ISEIB - Educação de qualidade”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://iseib.edu.br/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at iseib.edu.br/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 32 internal links, 25 external

    The homepage links to 32 pages on iseib.edu.br and 25 external pages.

AI search readiness

1 to fix81
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://iseib.edu.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (322 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 12 pages share a title

    /, https://iseib.edu.br/graduacao-ead, https://iseib.edu.br/graduacao-semipresencial, https://iseib.edu.br/graduacao-presencial, https://iseib.edu.br/resultado and https://iseib.edu.br/cursos-pos/index.php and 6 others all use the title “Faculdades ISEIB”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://iseib.edu.br/portifolio/portfolio has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 11 pages share a meta description

    https://iseib.edu.br/graduacao-ead, https://iseib.edu.br/graduacao-semipresencial, https://iseib.edu.br/graduacao-presencial, https://iseib.edu.br/resultado, https://iseib.edu.br/cursos-pos/index.php and https://iseib.edu.br/segunda-graduacao and 5 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 8 pages without an H1

    https://iseib.edu.br/resultado, https://iseib.edu.br/cursos-pos/index.php, https://iseib.edu.br/extensao, https://iseib.edu.br/brinquedoteca-virtual, https://iseib.edu.br/base-de-dados and https://iseib.edu.br/repositorio and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 27 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7391
  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    7 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 285 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 285 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at iseib.edu.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2021.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on iseib.edu.br, including 14 speed issues, 9 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25